Comparative analysis of tools for development of native and hybrid mobile applications

2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) Pub Date : 2017-05-22 DOI:10.23919/MIPRO.2017.7973662

Tena Vilcek, Tomislav Jakopec

{"title":"Comparative analysis of tools for development of native and hybrid mobile applications","authors":"Tena Vilcek, Tomislav Jakopec","doi":"10.23919/MIPRO.2017.7973662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main reasons for wide acceptance of smartphones are mobile applications that offer a wide variety of features. This paper deals with types of mobile applications: hybrid and native, as well as tools that enable their development. For purposes of this paper, a total of eight simple, identical applications were made for Android, iOS and Windows Phone. Native applications for Android, iOS and Windows Phone were made in integrated development environment, or so-called IDEs: Android Studio, Xcode and Visual Studio. Hybrid applications for Android and iOS were made in Ionic, PhoneGap and NativeScript framework. The paper compares tools used for development through following criteria: supported computer operating system, supported mobile platforms, programming languages, official documentations and community of programmers, installation and development. Goal is to research the advantages and disadvantages of the tools used for development of native and hybrid mobile applications and to find out which applications are the most profitable.","PeriodicalId":203046,"journal":{"name":"2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2017.7973662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

Abstract

One of the main reasons for wide acceptance of smartphones are mobile applications that offer a wide variety of features. This paper deals with types of mobile applications: hybrid and native, as well as tools that enable their development. For purposes of this paper, a total of eight simple, identical applications were made for Android, iOS and Windows Phone. Native applications for Android, iOS and Windows Phone were made in integrated development environment, or so-called IDEs: Android Studio, Xcode and Visual Studio. Hybrid applications for Android and iOS were made in Ionic, PhoneGap and NativeScript framework. The paper compares tools used for development through following criteria: supported computer operating system, supported mobile platforms, programming languages, official documentations and community of programmers, installation and development. Goal is to research the advantages and disadvantages of the tools used for development of native and hybrid mobile applications and to find out which applications are the most profitable.

查看原文本刊更多论文

本地和混合移动应用开发工具的比较分析

智能手机被广泛接受的主要原因之一是移动应用程序提供了各种各样的功能。本文将讨论各种类型的移动应用程序:混合应用程序和本机应用程序，以及支持其开发的工具。为了本文的目的，总共为Android、iOS和Windows Phone开发了8个简单的、相同的应用程序。Android、iOS和Windows Phone的本地应用程序是在集成开发环境中制作的，或所谓的ide: Android Studio、Xcode和Visual Studio。Android和iOS的混合应用是在Ionic、PhoneGap和NativeScript框架下开发的。本文通过以下标准对用于开发的工具进行比较:支持的计算机操作系统，支持的移动平台，编程语言，官方文档和程序员社区，安装和开发。目标是研究用于开发本地和混合移动应用程序的工具的优缺点，并找出哪些应用程序最有利可图。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)

自引率

0.00%

发文量