Az okos város fogalom megjelenése a magyar közép- és nagyvárosok fejlesztési dokumentumaiban

{"title":"Az okos város fogalom megjelenése a magyar közép- és nagyvárosok fejlesztési dokumentumaiban","authors":"","doi":"10.32643/fk.146.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, there has been a tremendous spread of the term “smart city” in theoretical works as well as in urban planning practices. This study investigates the impact of this process in the Hungarian context. The main goal of the paper is to analyse specific policy documents of the thirty-one most populous towns in Hungary. The sample excludes the capital city, Budapest, which differs significantly from these towns in size and in the grade of international embeddedness. The majority of the scrutinised documents were written in the same time period and in the same structure, which makes them a good basis for comparison. The results show that the term “smart city” started to appear in urban development plans in 2014. This is when most of the documents still in force today were written. The term was used in many different ways, however. In some cases, policy documents presented a detailed “smart city vision” for the future. In five municipalities, the local government even approved a smart city strategy. In many other towns, policy documents only referred to the “smart city” either with regard to a specific project or in very broad terms. Moreover, documents in 40% of the examined towns do not mention the term at all. For factors influencing the emergence of the term (or its absence), geographical location does not show a clear relevance, and settlement size seems to play a role only in the five most populous cities. However, the results suggest some correlation with central urban functions.","PeriodicalId":305418,"journal":{"name":"Földrajzi Közlemények","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Földrajzi Közlemények","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32643/fk.146.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recently, there has been a tremendous spread of the term “smart city” in theoretical works as well as in urban planning practices. This study investigates the impact of this process in the Hungarian context. The main goal of the paper is to analyse specific policy documents of the thirty-one most populous towns in Hungary. The sample excludes the capital city, Budapest, which differs significantly from these towns in size and in the grade of international embeddedness. The majority of the scrutinised documents were written in the same time period and in the same structure, which makes them a good basis for comparison. The results show that the term “smart city” started to appear in urban development plans in 2014. This is when most of the documents still in force today were written. The term was used in many different ways, however. In some cases, policy documents presented a detailed “smart city vision” for the future. In five municipalities, the local government even approved a smart city strategy. In many other towns, policy documents only referred to the “smart city” either with regard to a specific project or in very broad terms. Moreover, documents in 40% of the examined towns do not mention the term at all. For factors influencing the emergence of the term (or its absence), geographical location does not show a clear relevance, and settlement size seems to play a role only in the five most populous cities. However, the results suggest some correlation with central urban functions.
近年来,“智慧城市”一词在理论工作和城市规划实践中得到了广泛的传播。本研究调查了这一过程在匈牙利背景下的影响。本文的主要目的是分析匈牙利31个人口最多的城镇的具体政策文件。样本不包括首都布达佩斯,布达佩斯在规模和国际嵌入程度上与这些城镇有很大不同。大多数经过审查的文件都是在同一时期以相同的结构写成的,这使它们成为比较的良好基础。结果表明,“智慧城市”一词从2014年开始出现在城市发展规划中。今天仍然有效的大多数文件都是在这个时候写成的。然而,这个词有很多不同的用法。在某些情况下,政策文件对未来提出了详细的“智慧城市愿景”。在五个城市,当地政府甚至批准了智慧城市战略。在许多其他城镇,政策文件只提到“智慧城市”,或者是关于一个特定的项目,或者是非常广泛的术语。此外,在被调查的城镇中,40%的文件根本没有提到这个词。对于影响这个词出现(或消失)的因素,地理位置并没有显示出明确的相关性,而聚落规模似乎只在五个人口最多的城市中发挥作用。然而,结果表明与中心城市功能有一定的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信