Linear vs. Nonlinear Robustness Analysis: A Case Study

S. Fekri, D. Bates, I. Postlethwaite
{"title":"Linear vs. Nonlinear Robustness Analysis: A Case Study","authors":"S. Fekri, D. Bates, I. Postlethwaite","doi":"10.1109/CCA.2007.4389323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a case study designed to highlight some of the practical issues that can arise when using linear robustness analysis techniques such as the structured singular value mu to analyse the robustness of uncertain nonlinear systems. The problem considered in the case study is the familiar ball and beam position control task, where the mass of the ball and the time-delay in the beam actuator are assumed to be uncertain. Using a symbolic linear fractional transformation (LFT)-based modelling approach, it is shown how both the original nonlinear and linearised plants may be represented in the form of LFT's. A linear controller is designed for the uncertain linearised plant using a mu-synthesis approach. The robustness of the linear and nonlinear closed-loop systems is then checked using mu-analysis and the Popov criterion, respectively. It is shown that as the degree of nonlinearity in the plant is increased, a sharp fall in the robustness properties of the controller from those predicted by the linear analysis is observed. The results of the study highlight the need for additional nonlinear analysis to confirm robustness analysis results derived using linearised models of nonlinear systems, as is usually the case in practice.","PeriodicalId":176828,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCA.2007.4389323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We present a case study designed to highlight some of the practical issues that can arise when using linear robustness analysis techniques such as the structured singular value mu to analyse the robustness of uncertain nonlinear systems. The problem considered in the case study is the familiar ball and beam position control task, where the mass of the ball and the time-delay in the beam actuator are assumed to be uncertain. Using a symbolic linear fractional transformation (LFT)-based modelling approach, it is shown how both the original nonlinear and linearised plants may be represented in the form of LFT's. A linear controller is designed for the uncertain linearised plant using a mu-synthesis approach. The robustness of the linear and nonlinear closed-loop systems is then checked using mu-analysis and the Popov criterion, respectively. It is shown that as the degree of nonlinearity in the plant is increased, a sharp fall in the robustness properties of the controller from those predicted by the linear analysis is observed. The results of the study highlight the need for additional nonlinear analysis to confirm robustness analysis results derived using linearised models of nonlinear systems, as is usually the case in practice.
线性与非线性稳健性分析:一个案例研究
我们提出了一个案例研究,旨在强调使用线性鲁棒性分析技术(如结构化奇异值mu)分析不确定非线性系统的鲁棒性时可能出现的一些实际问题。在案例研究中考虑的问题是熟悉的球和梁的位置控制任务,其中假设球的质量和梁执行器中的时滞是不确定的。使用基于符号线性分数变换(LFT)的建模方法,显示了原始非线性和线性化植物如何以LFT的形式表示。针对不确定线性化对象,采用多元综合方法设计了线性控制器。然后分别使用mu分析和波波夫准则检查了线性和非线性闭环系统的鲁棒性。结果表明,随着对象非线性程度的增加,控制器的鲁棒性与线性分析预测的鲁棒性相比急剧下降。研究结果强调需要额外的非线性分析来确认使用非线性系统的线性化模型得出的鲁棒性分析结果,这在实践中通常是这样的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信