The Conceptualization and Measurement of Ethnic and Religious Divisions : Categorical, Temporal, and Spatial Dimensions with Evidence from Mindanao, the Philippines

Rachel M. Gisselquist, O. McDoom
{"title":"The Conceptualization and Measurement of Ethnic and Religious Divisions : Categorical, Temporal, and Spatial Dimensions with Evidence from Mindanao, the Philippines","authors":"Rachel M. Gisselquist, O. McDoom","doi":"10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2015/907-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large body of recent quantitative work on the ‘diversity detriment’ hypothesis finds that ethno-religious diversity is linked with a host of societal ills, implying in turn a strong challenge to multiculturalist theory and policies. Given the stakes, the appropriate conceptualization and measurement of ethno-religious divisions is a matter of considerable importance. This paper provides a synthetic critique of how major measures each capture the notion of ‘divisions’ and relate to each other conceptually and empirically within a divided society. Furthermore, instead of presenting temporal snapshots of divisions at the national level, as in most previous work on the topic, we explore how measures perform at more localized levels of analysis and over time, drawing on individual level census data from Mindanao, the Philippines. We highlight four conceptually ‘big’ issues we believe deserve emphasis and further investigation: the sensitivity of measures to the choice of construct, categorization methodology, passage of time, and spatial variation. We provide guidance and discuss the key implications of these points both for quantitative scholars working with these measures and for qualitatively inclined empiricists and normative theorists wishing to interpret, evaluate or otherwise engage with the quantitative research on the merits of diversity.","PeriodicalId":359449,"journal":{"name":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2015/907-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A large body of recent quantitative work on the ‘diversity detriment’ hypothesis finds that ethno-religious diversity is linked with a host of societal ills, implying in turn a strong challenge to multiculturalist theory and policies. Given the stakes, the appropriate conceptualization and measurement of ethno-religious divisions is a matter of considerable importance. This paper provides a synthetic critique of how major measures each capture the notion of ‘divisions’ and relate to each other conceptually and empirically within a divided society. Furthermore, instead of presenting temporal snapshots of divisions at the national level, as in most previous work on the topic, we explore how measures perform at more localized levels of analysis and over time, drawing on individual level census data from Mindanao, the Philippines. We highlight four conceptually ‘big’ issues we believe deserve emphasis and further investigation: the sensitivity of measures to the choice of construct, categorization methodology, passage of time, and spatial variation. We provide guidance and discuss the key implications of these points both for quantitative scholars working with these measures and for qualitatively inclined empiricists and normative theorists wishing to interpret, evaluate or otherwise engage with the quantitative research on the merits of diversity.
民族和宗教划分的概念化和测量:类别、时间和空间维度——来自菲律宾棉兰老岛的证据
最近关于“多样性损害”假设的大量定量研究发现,种族-宗教多样性与许多社会弊病有关,这反过来意味着对多元文化主义理论和政策的强烈挑战。考虑到这些利害关系,对种族-宗教划分进行适当的概念化和衡量是一个相当重要的问题。本文提供了一个综合的批评,每个主要措施如何捕捉“分裂”的概念,并在一个分裂的社会中在概念上和经验上相互联系。此外,与以往大多数关于该主题的工作一样,我们没有在国家层面上展示分歧的时间快照,而是利用菲律宾棉兰老岛的个人层面人口普查数据,探讨了在更本地化的分析层面和随着时间的推移,这些措施是如何执行的。我们强调了我们认为值得强调和进一步研究的四个概念上的“大”问题:对结构选择、分类方法、时间流逝和空间变化的敏感性。我们为使用这些措施的定量学者,以及希望解释、评估或以其他方式参与多样性优点定量研究的定性倾向的经验主义者和规范理论家提供指导和讨论这些要点的关键含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信