Pragmatics of the Labor Market VS High Meanings of Cultural Education

I. Akhyamova, M. Belyaeva, E. Efremova
{"title":"Pragmatics of the Labor Market VS High Meanings of Cultural Education","authors":"I. Akhyamova, M. Belyaeva, E. Efremova","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200723.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— The impact of the labor market on the content of education is one of the urgent challenges for the modern system of higher education, including cultural studies. The authors, relying on many years of personal experience in the education system and modern scientific research, reflect on the results of the development and further prospects of the development of “applied cultural science” as a field of cultural knowledge, the focus of which should also be the adaptation of culturologists in the labor market. They also determine their vision of the meanings of cultural education and analyze the possible professional roles of a culturologist, noting the changes that have occurred in the requests of employers. The authors substantiate the conditions for the training of specialists for the cultural sphere in its industry sense, based on the experience of training personnel at Ekaterinburg Academy of Contemporary Art (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation) and compare federal educational state standards “51.03.01 Culturology” (undergraduate level) 2016 and 2018. They reflect on the integration of educational and professional standards. The authors are looking for \"bridges\" between the understandable pragmatics of the labor market, the problem field of applied cultural studies and the high meanings of cultural education.","PeriodicalId":191967,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— The impact of the labor market on the content of education is one of the urgent challenges for the modern system of higher education, including cultural studies. The authors, relying on many years of personal experience in the education system and modern scientific research, reflect on the results of the development and further prospects of the development of “applied cultural science” as a field of cultural knowledge, the focus of which should also be the adaptation of culturologists in the labor market. They also determine their vision of the meanings of cultural education and analyze the possible professional roles of a culturologist, noting the changes that have occurred in the requests of employers. The authors substantiate the conditions for the training of specialists for the cultural sphere in its industry sense, based on the experience of training personnel at Ekaterinburg Academy of Contemporary Art (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation) and compare federal educational state standards “51.03.01 Culturology” (undergraduate level) 2016 and 2018. They reflect on the integration of educational and professional standards. The authors are looking for "bridges" between the understandable pragmatics of the labor market, the problem field of applied cultural studies and the high meanings of cultural education.
劳动力市场的实用主义 VS 文化教育的崇高意义
——劳动力市场对教育内容的影响是现代高等教育体系(包括文化研究)面临的紧迫挑战之一。作者依托多年在教育系统和现代科学研究中的亲身经历,反思“应用文化科学”作为文化知识领域的发展成果和进一步发展前景,其重点也应该是文化学家在劳动力市场中的适应问题。他们还确定了他们对文化教育意义的看法,并分析了文化学家可能的职业角色,注意到雇主要求中发生的变化。作者根据叶卡捷琳堡当代艺术学院(叶卡捷琳堡,俄罗斯联邦)培训人员的经验,从工业意义上证实了培养文化领域专家的条件,并比较了2016年和2018年联邦教育国家标准“51.03.01文化”(本科水平)。它们反映了教育标准和专业标准的融合。作者在劳动力市场的可理解语用学、应用文化研究的问题领域和文化教育的崇高意义之间寻找“桥梁”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信