Adjusting Air-Assistance and Nozzle Style for Optimized Airblast Sprayer Use in Eastern Washington Vineyards

Mary L. McCoy, G. Hoheisel, L. Khot, M. Moyer
{"title":"Adjusting Air-Assistance and Nozzle Style for Optimized Airblast Sprayer Use in Eastern Washington Vineyards","authors":"Mary L. McCoy, G. Hoheisel, L. Khot, M. Moyer","doi":"10.5344/catalyst.2021.21001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Goals: There are many ways to optimize an airblast sprayer for use in vineyards. Three techniques growers use include: 1) changing nozzle type, 2) reconfiguring or adjusting the nozzles, and 3) adjusting the air-assistance to the droplets during an application. This study evaluated the effects of nozzle type and air-assistance use in airblast sprayers on canopy spray deposition and drift in a Washington winegrape vineyard that is trained to a modified vertical shoot-positioning system. Key Findings: The one-piece nozzle with air assistance showed consistently high total collected canopy deposition regardless of time of season (early or mid-season). However, drift was reduced when air-assistance was not used. The air induction nozzle had the most total collected canopy deposition when using air-assistance during the early season, but had the most deposition mid-season without using air-assistance. Drift was reduced when air assistance was not used. Early in the growing season, maximum spray deposition in the fruiting zone of the canopy was achieved using air induction nozzles with air-assistance. However, using the air induction nozzle without air optimized fruiting zone spray deposition while reducing captured aerial drift. Mid-growing season, maximum fruiting zone spray deposition without high drift was achieved using air induction nozzles without air-assistance. Impact and Significance: An airblast sprayer optimized through changes in nozzle or use of air-assistance can improve spray deposition into the canopy while minimizing drift. Growers can compare and adopt these drift-reduction techniques, such as using air induction nozzles and/or turning air-assistance off, to determine which are best suited for their farming practices. Such an approach will allow better optimization of the sprayer for their vineyard spray application needs and reduces possible negative impacts associated with off-target chemical deposition on humans and the environment.","PeriodicalId":170363,"journal":{"name":"Catalyst: Discovery into Practice","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalyst: Discovery into Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5344/catalyst.2021.21001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Summary Goals: There are many ways to optimize an airblast sprayer for use in vineyards. Three techniques growers use include: 1) changing nozzle type, 2) reconfiguring or adjusting the nozzles, and 3) adjusting the air-assistance to the droplets during an application. This study evaluated the effects of nozzle type and air-assistance use in airblast sprayers on canopy spray deposition and drift in a Washington winegrape vineyard that is trained to a modified vertical shoot-positioning system. Key Findings: The one-piece nozzle with air assistance showed consistently high total collected canopy deposition regardless of time of season (early or mid-season). However, drift was reduced when air-assistance was not used. The air induction nozzle had the most total collected canopy deposition when using air-assistance during the early season, but had the most deposition mid-season without using air-assistance. Drift was reduced when air assistance was not used. Early in the growing season, maximum spray deposition in the fruiting zone of the canopy was achieved using air induction nozzles with air-assistance. However, using the air induction nozzle without air optimized fruiting zone spray deposition while reducing captured aerial drift. Mid-growing season, maximum fruiting zone spray deposition without high drift was achieved using air induction nozzles without air-assistance. Impact and Significance: An airblast sprayer optimized through changes in nozzle or use of air-assistance can improve spray deposition into the canopy while minimizing drift. Growers can compare and adopt these drift-reduction techniques, such as using air induction nozzles and/or turning air-assistance off, to determine which are best suited for their farming practices. Such an approach will allow better optimization of the sprayer for their vineyard spray application needs and reduces possible negative impacts associated with off-target chemical deposition on humans and the environment.
调整空气辅助和喷嘴风格优化空气喷淋机在华盛顿东部葡萄园的使用
目标:有许多方法可以优化风喷淋机在葡萄园的使用。种植者使用的三种技术包括:1)改变喷嘴类型,2)重新配置或调整喷嘴,以及3)在应用过程中调整液滴的空气辅助。本研究评估了喷嘴类型和空气辅助在风喷淋机中使用对树冠喷雾沉积和漂移的影响,该影响在华盛顿葡萄酒葡萄园进行了改良的垂直射击定位系统训练。关键发现:在空气辅助下的一体式喷嘴无论季节何时(季初或季中)都显示出一贯高的冠层沉积总量。然而,当不使用空中辅助时,漂移减少了。在季初使用空气辅助时,空气诱导喷嘴收集的冠层沉积总量最多,而在未使用空气辅助的情况下,季中累积最多。当不使用空中辅助时,漂移减少了。在生长季早期,使用空气辅助的空气诱导喷嘴可使冠层果区的喷雾沉降量最大。然而,采用空气感应喷嘴无需空气,优化了果区喷雾沉积的同时减少了捕获的空气漂移。在生长季中期,采用无空气辅助的空气感应喷嘴可实现最大果区喷雾沉降,且无高漂移。影响和意义:通过改变喷嘴或使用空气辅助来优化的风喷淋机可以改善喷淋在雨篷中的沉积,同时最大限度地减少漂移。种植者可以比较和采用这些减少漂移的技术,例如使用空气感应喷嘴和/或关闭空气辅助,以确定哪种技术最适合他们的农业实践。这种方法可以更好地优化喷雾器,以满足他们的葡萄园喷雾应用需求,并减少与脱靶化学沉积有关的对人类和环境可能产生的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信