Cortical bone age estimates from historically known adults.

S Pfeiffer
{"title":"Cortical bone age estimates from historically known adults.","authors":"S Pfeiffer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adult skeletal remains from 19th century historic cemeteries were used to test the accuracy and precision of age estimations based on the cortical bone histological technique proposed by Thompson [6, 7]. Comparison of estimates made from anterior microscopic fields versus peripheral fields (N = 29 femora) indicates general age agreement, with 6/29 demonstrating marked differences between sampling locations. Three cases of unilateral trauma show no consistent effect on bone age estimates. Among sixteen adults of known age, the ages of eight were accurately estimated; five were estimated to be significantly older and three were estimated to be younger than they were. It is argued that cortical erosion/diagenetic destruction may contribute to overestimation by obscuring the periosteal regions required for application of the technique. While not without its shortcomings, it is concluded that the Thompson technique is relatively robust and merits further development.</p>","PeriodicalId":76854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie","volume":"79 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adult skeletal remains from 19th century historic cemeteries were used to test the accuracy and precision of age estimations based on the cortical bone histological technique proposed by Thompson [6, 7]. Comparison of estimates made from anterior microscopic fields versus peripheral fields (N = 29 femora) indicates general age agreement, with 6/29 demonstrating marked differences between sampling locations. Three cases of unilateral trauma show no consistent effect on bone age estimates. Among sixteen adults of known age, the ages of eight were accurately estimated; five were estimated to be significantly older and three were estimated to be younger than they were. It is argued that cortical erosion/diagenetic destruction may contribute to overestimation by obscuring the periosteal regions required for application of the technique. While not without its shortcomings, it is concluded that the Thompson technique is relatively robust and merits further development.

从历史上已知的成年人中估计皮质骨年龄。
来自19世纪历史墓地的成人骨骼遗骸被用来测试基于Thompson提出的皮质骨组织学技术的年龄估计的准确性和精度[6,7]。比较前显微镜视野与外周视野(N = 29股)的估计表明年龄大致一致,其中6/29显示采样位置之间的显着差异。三例单侧创伤对骨龄估计没有一致的影响。在16名已知年龄的成年人中,准确估计了他们8岁的年龄;据估计,其中5人明显比他们年长,3人比他们年轻。有人认为,皮质侵蚀/成岩破坏可能通过模糊应用该技术所需的骨膜区域而导致高估。虽然不是没有缺点,但结论是汤普森技术是相对稳健的,值得进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信