Induction Vs. permanent magnet motors for electric submersible pumps field and laboratory comparisons

T. Brinner, R. McCoy, T. Kopecky
{"title":"Induction Vs. permanent magnet motors for electric submersible pumps field and laboratory comparisons","authors":"T. Brinner, R. McCoy, T. Kopecky","doi":"10.1109/pcicon.2012.6549670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most hydrocarbon production using submersible pumps requires the pumping of fluid that is 95% water or higher. Energy used to produce salt water is wasted, and disposal is expensive. Electricity costs are significant and system efficiency is a major concern. In this application induction motors are less efficient than permanent magnet motors. Laboratory tests measured efficiency, power factor, kilowatts, current and speed at various loads and frequencies. Field-tests measured input power and flow, using the same pump for both systems with negligible well drawdown. On average the permanent magnet motor used 20% less power than the induction motor.","PeriodicalId":133636,"journal":{"name":"2012 Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference (PCIC)","volume":"13 31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference (PCIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/pcicon.2012.6549670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Most hydrocarbon production using submersible pumps requires the pumping of fluid that is 95% water or higher. Energy used to produce salt water is wasted, and disposal is expensive. Electricity costs are significant and system efficiency is a major concern. In this application induction motors are less efficient than permanent magnet motors. Laboratory tests measured efficiency, power factor, kilowatts, current and speed at various loads and frequencies. Field-tests measured input power and flow, using the same pump for both systems with negligible well drawdown. On average the permanent magnet motor used 20% less power than the induction motor.
电潜泵用感应电机与永磁电机的现场及实验室比较
大多数使用潜水泵的油气生产都需要泵送95%以上的水。用于生产盐水的能源是浪费的,而且处理费用昂贵。电力成本很高,系统效率是一个主要问题。在这种应用中,感应电动机的效率不如永磁电动机。实验室测试测量了各种负载和频率下的效率、功率因数、千瓦、电流和速度。现场测试测量了两种系统的输入功率和流量,使用相同的泵,井压可以忽略不计。永磁电机比感应电机平均少用20%的功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信