واقعہ غرانیق: مفسرین اور اہلِ سیر کے نقطۂ نگاہ کا تجزیاتی مطالعہ (مستشرقین کے اعتراضات کے تناظر میں) The Incident of Gharaniq: An Analytical Study of the Views of Quranic Commentators and Seerah Writers (In the Context of Orientalists’ Objections)

Al-Wifaq Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.55603/alwifaq.v5i1.u6
Samina Sadia
{"title":"واقعہ غرانیق: مفسرین اور اہلِ سیر کے نقطۂ نگاہ کا تجزیاتی مطالعہ (مستشرقین کے اعتراضات کے تناظر میں)\nThe Incident of Gharaniq: An Analytical Study of the Views of Quranic Commentators and Seerah Writers (In the Context of Orientalists’ Objections)","authors":"Samina Sadia","doi":"10.55603/alwifaq.v5i1.u6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incident of Gharānīq is one of the most debated topics in the biography of the Holy Prophet, and there is a difference of opinion among the commentators as to its validity. The first narrators of this incident are Ibn Sa'ad and Allāma Ibn e Jarīr Tabrī. Later, many commentators of the Holy Qur’ān and biographers of the Holy Prophet narrated this incident. A group of scholars, while acknowledging the reality of the incident, have offered justifications in this regard. The justification adopted by the majority of earlier and modern scholars is that the praising words for gods were uttered by the devil and not by the Holy Prophet, but the Orientalists have tried to prove that Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) tried to get close to the polytheists of Makkah. In this article, it will be discussed that the majority of scholars have termed this incident as fabricated on the basis of rational and traditional evidence. Many contemporary biographers, such as Allāma Shiblī Naumanī, Muhammad Hussaīn Hekal and Dr. Muhammad Hamidullāh, have given reasoned answers to the objections of Orientalists regarding this incident. This incident contradicts the basic teachings of Islam and the infallibility of prophethood.","PeriodicalId":180417,"journal":{"name":"Al-Wifaq","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Wifaq","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55603/alwifaq.v5i1.u6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incident of Gharānīq is one of the most debated topics in the biography of the Holy Prophet, and there is a difference of opinion among the commentators as to its validity. The first narrators of this incident are Ibn Sa'ad and Allāma Ibn e Jarīr Tabrī. Later, many commentators of the Holy Qur’ān and biographers of the Holy Prophet narrated this incident. A group of scholars, while acknowledging the reality of the incident, have offered justifications in this regard. The justification adopted by the majority of earlier and modern scholars is that the praising words for gods were uttered by the devil and not by the Holy Prophet, but the Orientalists have tried to prove that Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) tried to get close to the polytheists of Makkah. In this article, it will be discussed that the majority of scholars have termed this incident as fabricated on the basis of rational and traditional evidence. Many contemporary biographers, such as Allāma Shiblī Naumanī, Muhammad Hussaīn Hekal and Dr. Muhammad Hamidullāh, have given reasoned answers to the objections of Orientalists regarding this incident. This incident contradicts the basic teachings of Islam and the infallibility of prophethood.
Gharānīq事件是神圣先知传记中最具争议的话题之一,评论员对其有效性存在不同意见。这一事件的第一个叙述者是伊本·萨阿德和Allāma伊本·贾尔·塔布尔。后来,许多《古兰经》的评论者ān和圣先知的传记作者叙述了这一事件。一些学者在承认这一事件的真实性的同时,也提出了这方面的理由。大多数早期和现代学者所采用的理由是,赞美神灵的话语是魔鬼而不是神圣的先知说的,但东方主义者试图证明先知哈兹拉特穆罕默德(愿主福安之)试图接近麦加的多神教徒。在本文中,将讨论大多数学者认为这一事件是在理性和传统证据的基础上捏造的。许多同时代的传记作家,如Allāma shibli naumani、Muhammad hussaurn Hekal和Dr. Muhammad Hamidullāh,都对东方学家对这一事件的反对给出了合理的回答。这一事件与伊斯兰教的基本教义和先知的绝对正确相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信