Comparison of Fibroscan with Liver biopsy in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients for assessing fibrosis

Ganraj Bhat, S. Likitha, R. Krishnappa, G. Agarwal, R. Kiran, T. Nagesh Kumar
{"title":"Comparison of Fibroscan with Liver biopsy in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients for assessing fibrosis","authors":"Ganraj Bhat, S. Likitha, R. Krishnappa, G. Agarwal, R. Kiran, T. Nagesh Kumar","doi":"10.4103/NJGH.NJGH_9_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in India varies from 9 to 35%. NAFLD is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Liver biopsy, which is the gold standard for diagnosing NAFLD is an invasive procedure with potential adverse effects and large inter- and intra-observer variability. Hence, various noninvasive markers are being explored to assist in the diagnosis of NAFLD. Fibroscan measures liver stiffness through estimation of the velocity of propagation of a shear wave through liver tissue. Very few studies have addressed the accuracy of fibroscan versus liver biopsy. Objectives: To grade liver fibrosis in the patients and compare fibrosis score by fibroscan with that of liver biopsy in NAFLD. Materials and Methods: An observational study of 72 subjects who had presented with fatty liver on ultrasound and further subjected to fibroscan at the outpatient department of gastroenterology and have undergone liver biopsy (gold standard) for confirmation in the Department of Pathology, Ramaiah Medical College. The study was done from January 2017 to December 2018. After routine processing, liver biopsies were categorized into four subgroups depending on the fibrosis score such as F1 (perivenular fibrosis), F2 (periportal fibrosis), F3 (bridging fibrosis), and F4 (cirrhosis) and was compared with fibroscan scoring, which was based on the degree of fibrosis. Results: Our study revealed that in the subgroup of NAFLD patients with F1, F2, F3 fibrosis on biopsy, the mean fibroscan values were 11.84 ± 9.23, 16.98 ± 18.85, 21.93 ± 5.85, respectively, which overestimate the fibrosis score (2.5–7.5 Kpa), (7.6–10 Kpa), (10.1–13 Kpa), respectively, and in F4 fibrosis, the mean fibroscan value was 33.41 ± 17.39 and in concordance with the fibrosis score (>13 Kpa). Conclusion: Fibroscan overestimates the fibrosis score in the early stages of NAFLD, whereas, it has high accuracy in detecting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Hence, it can be concluded that transient elastography is a good adjunctive tool in NAFLD patients with advanced fibrosis.","PeriodicalId":354969,"journal":{"name":"NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/NJGH.NJGH_9_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in India varies from 9 to 35%. NAFLD is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Liver biopsy, which is the gold standard for diagnosing NAFLD is an invasive procedure with potential adverse effects and large inter- and intra-observer variability. Hence, various noninvasive markers are being explored to assist in the diagnosis of NAFLD. Fibroscan measures liver stiffness through estimation of the velocity of propagation of a shear wave through liver tissue. Very few studies have addressed the accuracy of fibroscan versus liver biopsy. Objectives: To grade liver fibrosis in the patients and compare fibrosis score by fibroscan with that of liver biopsy in NAFLD. Materials and Methods: An observational study of 72 subjects who had presented with fatty liver on ultrasound and further subjected to fibroscan at the outpatient department of gastroenterology and have undergone liver biopsy (gold standard) for confirmation in the Department of Pathology, Ramaiah Medical College. The study was done from January 2017 to December 2018. After routine processing, liver biopsies were categorized into four subgroups depending on the fibrosis score such as F1 (perivenular fibrosis), F2 (periportal fibrosis), F3 (bridging fibrosis), and F4 (cirrhosis) and was compared with fibroscan scoring, which was based on the degree of fibrosis. Results: Our study revealed that in the subgroup of NAFLD patients with F1, F2, F3 fibrosis on biopsy, the mean fibroscan values were 11.84 ± 9.23, 16.98 ± 18.85, 21.93 ± 5.85, respectively, which overestimate the fibrosis score (2.5–7.5 Kpa), (7.6–10 Kpa), (10.1–13 Kpa), respectively, and in F4 fibrosis, the mean fibroscan value was 33.41 ± 17.39 and in concordance with the fibrosis score (>13 Kpa). Conclusion: Fibroscan overestimates the fibrosis score in the early stages of NAFLD, whereas, it has high accuracy in detecting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Hence, it can be concluded that transient elastography is a good adjunctive tool in NAFLD patients with advanced fibrosis.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者纤维扫描与肝活检评估纤维化的比较
背景:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)在印度的患病率从9%到35%不等。NAFLD是世界范围内慢性肝病最常见的病因之一。肝活检是诊断NAFLD的金标准,它是一种侵入性手术,有潜在的不良反应,观察者之间和内部都有很大的可变性。因此,各种非侵入性标志物正在被探索以协助NAFLD的诊断。纤维扫描通过估计横波通过肝组织的传播速度来测量肝脏硬度。很少有研究讨论纤维扫描与肝活检的准确性。目的:对NAFLD患者进行肝纤维化分级,并比较纤维扫描与肝活检的纤维化评分。材料与方法:观察性研究72例患者,均为超声表现为脂肪肝,在消化内科门诊行纤维扫描,并在Ramaiah医学院病理科行肝活检(金标准)确认。该研究于2017年1月至2018年12月进行。经常规处理后,根据纤维化评分将肝活检分为F1(静脉周围纤维化)、F2(门脉周围纤维化)、F3(桥接纤维化)、F4(肝硬化)四个亚组,并与基于纤维化程度的纤维扫描评分进行比较。结果:我们的研究显示,在活检F1、F2、F3纤维化的NAFLD患者亚组中,纤维扫描平均值分别为11.84±9.23、16.98±18.85、21.93±5.85,分别高估了纤维化评分(2.5-7.5 Kpa)、(7.6-10 Kpa)、(10.1-13 Kpa), F4纤维化患者的纤维扫描平均值为33.41±17.39,与纤维化评分(>13 Kpa)一致。结论:Fibroscan对NAFLD早期纤维化评分过高,而对晚期纤维化和肝硬化的检测准确率较高。因此,可以得出结论,瞬时弹性成像是NAFLD晚期纤维化患者的良好辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信