Is Zero-Balance Ultrafiltration an Effective Clinical Method for SIRS Prevention During Extracorporeal Circulation in Adults Heart Diseases Correction?

E. Vârlan
{"title":"Is Zero-Balance Ultrafiltration an Effective Clinical Method for SIRS Prevention During Extracorporeal Circulation in Adults Heart Diseases Correction?","authors":"E. Vârlan","doi":"10.47363/jccsr/2019(1)104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ultrafiltration, which is currently considered as a standard method to remove the excess water administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aims to minimize the adverse effects of hemodilution, such as tissue edema and blood transfusion. Three ultrafiltration techniques can be used before, during and after CPB procedure, including conventional ultrafiltration (CUF), zero-balance ultrafiltration (Z-BUF), and modified ultrafiltration (MUF) at the end of CPB. The aim of study: The present research attempts to revise the efficiency of Z-BUF ultrafiltration method, laboratory results, and clinical impacts. Material and methods: 94 adults (54 men and 40 women) with acquired heart diseases undergoing a single cardiac surgical procedure in condition of cardiopulmonary bypass (clamp aortic 89, 9± 38, 8 min. and pump 135,14 ± 45,17 min.) were divided into 3 groups. 1st group (no ultrafiltration) - 34 patients with classic cardiac surgery, 2nd with the use of zero-balance ultrafiltration (ZBUF) group - 37 patients with classic cardiac surgery, and 3rd group ZBUF with mini invasive cardiac surgery - 23 patients.","PeriodicalId":274729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Case Studies Reviews & Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Case Studies Reviews & Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jccsr/2019(1)104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultrafiltration, which is currently considered as a standard method to remove the excess water administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aims to minimize the adverse effects of hemodilution, such as tissue edema and blood transfusion. Three ultrafiltration techniques can be used before, during and after CPB procedure, including conventional ultrafiltration (CUF), zero-balance ultrafiltration (Z-BUF), and modified ultrafiltration (MUF) at the end of CPB. The aim of study: The present research attempts to revise the efficiency of Z-BUF ultrafiltration method, laboratory results, and clinical impacts. Material and methods: 94 adults (54 men and 40 women) with acquired heart diseases undergoing a single cardiac surgical procedure in condition of cardiopulmonary bypass (clamp aortic 89, 9± 38, 8 min. and pump 135,14 ± 45,17 min.) were divided into 3 groups. 1st group (no ultrafiltration) - 34 patients with classic cardiac surgery, 2nd with the use of zero-balance ultrafiltration (ZBUF) group - 37 patients with classic cardiac surgery, and 3rd group ZBUF with mini invasive cardiac surgery - 23 patients.
零平衡超滤是预防成人心脏病体外循环过程中SIRS的有效临床方法吗?
背景:超滤,目前被认为是去除体外循环(CPB)过程中过量水的标准方法,旨在最大限度地减少血液稀释的不良影响,如组织水肿和输血。在CPB过程前、过程中和过程后可采用三种超滤技术,包括常规超滤(CUF)、零平衡超滤(Z-BUF)和CPB结束时改性超滤(MUF)。研究目的:本研究试图修正Z-BUF超滤方法的效率、实验室结果和临床影响。材料与方法:94例成人获得性心脏病患者在体外循环条件下行单次心脏手术(主动脉夹持89,9±38,8 min,泵送135,14±45,17 min),男性54例,女性40例。第一组(无超滤)行经典心脏手术34例,第二组采用零平衡超滤(ZBUF)组行经典心脏手术37例,第三组采用ZBUF联合微创心脏手术23例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信