Book Review: The meaning of Europe: geography and geopolitics

Simon Dalby
{"title":"Book Review: The meaning of Europe: geography and geopolitics","authors":"Simon Dalby","doi":"10.1177/096746080100800316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"a western female stoicism. All three, she argues, conceptualize identity detached from firm territorial referents. In the epilogue, Comer reflects that an ethic of transnationalist, postmodern, female solidarity may foster justice – but that there are no sureties. Comer writes clearly, avoiding the stylistic complexities of much postmodern analysis. She admits that some of her readings are against the grain of other critical works, but makes a convincing case for her interpretations. I am struck, however, by Comer’s adherence to the conventions of literary criticism and her limited use of geographers’ work, given the book’s title and themes. She does not consistently delve into and represent the landscape and spatial themes that she claims are central to her arguments, nor is it always clear how she sees landscape connecting space and place. She notes that her predecessors writing on the west relied heavily on ‘perceptual geography’ from the 1970s (Bowden, Lowenthal, Meinig, Tuan) but her references to recent geographic works relate to postmodernism, space and place (Harvey, Soja, Massey) and she does not engage with contemporary cultural geographic writing on landscape (other than work by Stephen Daniels who is identified as an art critic), or with US feminist geographers. Despite these reservations, I value the book for bringing attention to the collective importance of these women’s writings and for offering an original interpretation of the place of the contemporary west in American geographical imaginations.","PeriodicalId":104830,"journal":{"name":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","volume":"111 3S 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

a western female stoicism. All three, she argues, conceptualize identity detached from firm territorial referents. In the epilogue, Comer reflects that an ethic of transnationalist, postmodern, female solidarity may foster justice – but that there are no sureties. Comer writes clearly, avoiding the stylistic complexities of much postmodern analysis. She admits that some of her readings are against the grain of other critical works, but makes a convincing case for her interpretations. I am struck, however, by Comer’s adherence to the conventions of literary criticism and her limited use of geographers’ work, given the book’s title and themes. She does not consistently delve into and represent the landscape and spatial themes that she claims are central to her arguments, nor is it always clear how she sees landscape connecting space and place. She notes that her predecessors writing on the west relied heavily on ‘perceptual geography’ from the 1970s (Bowden, Lowenthal, Meinig, Tuan) but her references to recent geographic works relate to postmodernism, space and place (Harvey, Soja, Massey) and she does not engage with contemporary cultural geographic writing on landscape (other than work by Stephen Daniels who is identified as an art critic), or with US feminist geographers. Despite these reservations, I value the book for bringing attention to the collective importance of these women’s writings and for offering an original interpretation of the place of the contemporary west in American geographical imaginations.
书评:《欧洲的意义:地理与地缘政治》
一个西方女性的禁欲主义。她认为,这三者都将身份概念化,脱离了固定的领土所指。在结语中,科默反思了跨国主义、后现代主义、女性团结的伦理可能会促进正义——但这并没有保证。科默写得很清楚,避免了许多后现代分析的文体复杂性。她承认,她的一些阅读与其他批评作品的风格背道而驰,但她的解释令人信服。然而,考虑到这本书的标题和主题,科默对文学批评惯例的坚持以及她对地理学家作品的有限使用,让我感到震惊。她并没有始终如一地深入研究和表现她声称是其论点核心的景观和空间主题,也不总是清楚她是如何看待景观连接空间和地点的。她指出,她的前辈关于西方的写作严重依赖于20世纪70年代的“感性地理学”(鲍登、洛温撒尔、梅宁、Tuan),但她引用的最近的地理作品与后现代主义、空间和地点有关(哈维、索雅、梅西),她没有参与当代文化地理关于景观的写作(除了被认为是艺术评论家的斯蒂芬·丹尼尔斯的作品),也没有参与美国女权主义地理学家的作品。尽管有这些保留意见,我还是很看重这本书,因为它引起了人们对这些女性作品的集体重要性的关注,并对当代西方在美国地理想象中的地位提供了一种原创的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信