Assets and Liabilities Management in Islamic Banking

B. Bidabad, Mahmoud Allahyarifard
{"title":"Assets and Liabilities Management in Islamic Banking","authors":"B. Bidabad, Mahmoud Allahyarifard","doi":"10.46281/IJIBFR.V3I2.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In this paper, we are going to consider assets and liabilities management (ALM) structure and instrument in Islamic banking. Since in Islamic banking depositors take partnership in benefits of the bank, so Islamic banking follows to maximizing benefits of beneficiaries and among them depositors. Therefore, there are dissimilarities between ALM approaches in Islamic banking and conventional banking. First, this dissimilarity comes from differences in the accounting system in Islamic banking in comparison to conventional banking. Secondly, usury illegalness and its related jurisprudence specifications indicate that time is not the solely the effective factor on increasing equity (deposited capital) return; but profit and loss sharing resulted from investment in the real economy sector is the essential base in monetary transactions. These two important factors are considerable factors in Islamic ALM. \nDesign/methodology/approach: we consider influence specifications of these factors in two banking approaches for creating Economic Value Added (EVA). \nFindings: Comparison of financial indices for the two types of banking leads us that Islamic banking is more efficient than conventional banking. \n","PeriodicalId":289590,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Research","volume":"73 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46281/IJIBFR.V3I2.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Purpose: In this paper, we are going to consider assets and liabilities management (ALM) structure and instrument in Islamic banking. Since in Islamic banking depositors take partnership in benefits of the bank, so Islamic banking follows to maximizing benefits of beneficiaries and among them depositors. Therefore, there are dissimilarities between ALM approaches in Islamic banking and conventional banking. First, this dissimilarity comes from differences in the accounting system in Islamic banking in comparison to conventional banking. Secondly, usury illegalness and its related jurisprudence specifications indicate that time is not the solely the effective factor on increasing equity (deposited capital) return; but profit and loss sharing resulted from investment in the real economy sector is the essential base in monetary transactions. These two important factors are considerable factors in Islamic ALM. Design/methodology/approach: we consider influence specifications of these factors in two banking approaches for creating Economic Value Added (EVA). Findings: Comparison of financial indices for the two types of banking leads us that Islamic banking is more efficient than conventional banking.
伊斯兰银行的资产和负债管理
目的:在本文中,我们将考虑伊斯兰银行的资产负债管理(ALM)结构和工具。由于伊斯兰银行的存款人与银行的利益是伙伴关系,因此伊斯兰银行遵循受益人和存款人利益最大化的原则。因此,伊斯兰银行的资产管理方法与传统银行存在差异。首先,这种差异来自伊斯兰银行会计制度与传统银行的不同。其次,高利贷违法性及其相关的法理规范表明,时间并不是提高权益(存款)收益的唯一有效因素;但投资实体经济部门产生的损益分担是货币交易的必要基础。这两个重要因素是伊斯兰ALM中相当重要的因素。设计/方法/方法:我们考虑在创造经济增加值(EVA)的两种银行方法中这些因素的影响规范。研究结果:比较两种类型银行的财务指标,我们发现伊斯兰银行比传统银行更有效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书