RUSSIAN WORLD AND IT`S SIGNS IN THE “CORRESPONDENCE OF ANDREI KURBSKY WITH IVAN THE TERRIBLE”

Аleksey S. Tishchenko
{"title":"RUSSIAN WORLD AND IT`S SIGNS IN THE “CORRESPONDENCE OF ANDREI KURBSKY WITH IVAN THE TERRIBLE”","authors":"Аleksey S. Tishchenko","doi":"10.18522/1995-0640-2022-3-80-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theme of the ‘Russian World’ is permanent in national literature, and rather often it is closely connected with socio-political processes. The 16th century played a special role in the history of Russia, determining, to a great degree, the ways of further development of the country and posing significant political, philosophical, and social issues; the key historical figure of the period was Ivan the Terrible, whose reign is associated with the strengthening of an united centralized Russian state headed by Moscow and the expansion of the state. The discussions in his letters to Ivan the Terrible (the correspondence between Andrey Kurbsky and Ivan IV the Terrible of Russia) became a dispute about the Russian World. The correspondence reflected polar views on the same issues: the power and the figure of the ruler, the form of government, the ratio of statehood and the Orthodoxy, the loyalty of subjects to the ruler. The discussions in the letters of Kurbsky and Ivan the Terrible form a special image of the ‘Holy’ Russian Land, the ‘Kingdom of God’, and the phrase ‘the Russian land’ is used in the correspondence in the civilization sense. The message of Ivan the Terrible reflects the motive of the selection of Russia as a stronghold of the Orthodoxy; the Tsar speaks about the protection of the Orthodox faith by any means, even the cruelest ones. Autocracy, according to Ivan the Terrible, is inseparable from the Orthodox Christianity. The dialogue between the tsar and the prince is considered in the context of the opposition lines of ‘mine or ours, my or our own’ – ‘alien’, ‘the Russian world’ and ‘non-Russian one’: Kurbsky writes from abroad and is perceived as a traitor. The material of the letters highlights the signs and features of the Russian World as a special integral phenomenon: the Orthodoxy, selectivity, commonality and similarity of history and culture, Messianism.","PeriodicalId":228573,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology","volume":"587 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2022-3-80-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The theme of the ‘Russian World’ is permanent in national literature, and rather often it is closely connected with socio-political processes. The 16th century played a special role in the history of Russia, determining, to a great degree, the ways of further development of the country and posing significant political, philosophical, and social issues; the key historical figure of the period was Ivan the Terrible, whose reign is associated with the strengthening of an united centralized Russian state headed by Moscow and the expansion of the state. The discussions in his letters to Ivan the Terrible (the correspondence between Andrey Kurbsky and Ivan IV the Terrible of Russia) became a dispute about the Russian World. The correspondence reflected polar views on the same issues: the power and the figure of the ruler, the form of government, the ratio of statehood and the Orthodoxy, the loyalty of subjects to the ruler. The discussions in the letters of Kurbsky and Ivan the Terrible form a special image of the ‘Holy’ Russian Land, the ‘Kingdom of God’, and the phrase ‘the Russian land’ is used in the correspondence in the civilization sense. The message of Ivan the Terrible reflects the motive of the selection of Russia as a stronghold of the Orthodoxy; the Tsar speaks about the protection of the Orthodox faith by any means, even the cruelest ones. Autocracy, according to Ivan the Terrible, is inseparable from the Orthodox Christianity. The dialogue between the tsar and the prince is considered in the context of the opposition lines of ‘mine or ours, my or our own’ – ‘alien’, ‘the Russian world’ and ‘non-Russian one’: Kurbsky writes from abroad and is perceived as a traitor. The material of the letters highlights the signs and features of the Russian World as a special integral phenomenon: the Orthodoxy, selectivity, commonality and similarity of history and culture, Messianism.
“安德烈·库尔布斯基与伊凡雷帝的通信”中的俄国世界及其标志
“俄罗斯世界”的主题在民族文学中是永恒的,而且往往与社会政治进程密切相关。16世纪在俄罗斯历史上扮演着特殊的角色,在很大程度上决定了国家进一步发展的方式,并提出了重大的政治、哲学和社会问题;这一时期的关键历史人物是伊凡雷帝,他的统治与以莫斯科为首的统一中央集权的俄罗斯国家的加强和国家的扩张有关。他写给伊凡雷帝的信(安德烈·库尔布斯基与伊凡雷帝的通信)中的讨论变成了关于俄罗斯世界的争论。这些信件反映了对同一问题的两极看法:统治者的权力和形象,政府的形式,国家和东正教的比例,臣民对统治者的忠诚。库尔布斯基和伊凡雷帝的书信中的讨论形成了一个特殊的“神圣的”俄罗斯土地,“上帝的王国”的形象,“俄罗斯土地”这个词在文明意义上的通信中被使用。伊凡雷帝的信息反映了选择俄罗斯作为东正教据点的动机;沙皇说要用任何手段保护东正教信仰,即使是最残忍的手段伊凡雷帝认为,专制与东正教是分不开的。沙皇和王子之间的对话被认为是在“我的还是我们的,我的还是我们自己的”的对立线的背景下进行的-“外星人”,“俄罗斯世界”和“非俄罗斯世界”:库尔布斯基在国外写作,被认为是叛徒。这些信件的材料突出了俄罗斯世界作为一个特殊的整体现象的标志和特征:东正教,选择性,历史和文化的共性和相似性,弥赛亚主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信