Pro-Poor Growth: Illusions of Marriage and Divorce?

M. Suryanarayana
{"title":"Pro-Poor Growth: Illusions of Marriage and Divorce?","authors":"M. Suryanarayana","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1088383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of 'Pro-Poor Growth' has received wide currency in recent years. It has been provided with extra legitimacy with the UNDP Human Development Report 2005's special focus on its relevance to policies for poverty reduction. The International Poverty Centre of the UNDP at Brasilia has provided extra space for this debate in its regular publications like the In Focus and the One Pager. This note seeks to show that the debate on 'Pro-Poor Growth' is sterile and largely academic with few policy insights.","PeriodicalId":350026,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Human Development in Developing Economies (Topic)","volume":"18 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Human Development in Developing Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1088383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of 'Pro-Poor Growth' has received wide currency in recent years. It has been provided with extra legitimacy with the UNDP Human Development Report 2005's special focus on its relevance to policies for poverty reduction. The International Poverty Centre of the UNDP at Brasilia has provided extra space for this debate in its regular publications like the In Focus and the One Pager. This note seeks to show that the debate on 'Pro-Poor Growth' is sterile and largely academic with few policy insights.
有利于穷人的增长:婚姻和离婚的幻想?
近年来,“有利于穷人的增长”的概念得到了广泛的认可。联合国开发计划署《2005年人类发展报告》特别强调了其与减贫政策的相关性,从而为其提供了额外的合法性。位于巴西利亚的开发计划署国际贫穷中心在其定期出版物《焦点》和《一页报》中为这一辩论提供了额外的空间。本文试图表明,关于“有利于穷人的增长”的辩论是毫无成果的,基本上是学术性的,缺乏政策见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信