{"title":"PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA TERHADAP DEBITUR YANG WANPRESTASI SETELAH KELUARNYA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019","authors":"Robert Bouzen, Ashibly Ashibly","doi":"10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sertifikat jaminan fidusia berfungsi sebagai jaminan eksekusi ketika debitur cidera janji sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang RI Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 setelah adanya putusan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 telah mengubah konsep parate eksekusi jaminan fidusia oleh pihak kreditur (perusahaan pembiayaan) terhadap objek jaminan fidusia apabila debitur wanprestasi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dampak dari putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusia. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dan kesimpulan dalam karya ilmiah ini adalah terhadap jaminan fidusia yang tidak ada kesepakatan tentang cidera janji (wanprestasi) antara kedua belah pihak dan debitur keberatan menyerahkan secara sukarela objek yang menjadi jaminan fidusia, maka pelaksanaan eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia harus berdasarkan putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap meskipun sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia telah mencantumkan irah-irah sebagai title eksekutorial serta di dalam perjanjian pembiayaan terdapat klausul pelaksanaan parate eksekusi apabila debitur cidera janji (wanprestasi). \nThe fiducial bail certificate serves as a guarantee of execution when the debitur pledge as fixed in the 1999 article of the constitutional court number 18/ puu-xvii /2019 has changed the concept of the parate of fiduciary execution by the creditors (finance company) to the fiduciary bail on the fiduciary basis if the debtor's interest is felt. The purpose of this study is to know the effects of a constitutional court ruling on the execution of fiduciary bail. The methods in this study use the normative type of legal research. The results and conclusions in this scientific work are against fiduciary guarantees that there is no agreement on an adverse promise between the two sides and the borrower's objection of voluntarily handing over an object which is fiduciary security, Therefore, the execution of a fiduciary security object should be based on a legally strong court ruling even though a fiduciary bail certificate has been ironed as an executive title and in the finance agreement stipulates that the party-executed clause is carried out in the wake of an unspecified execution clause.","PeriodicalId":198081,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Gagasan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sertifikat jaminan fidusia berfungsi sebagai jaminan eksekusi ketika debitur cidera janji sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang RI Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 setelah adanya putusan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 telah mengubah konsep parate eksekusi jaminan fidusia oleh pihak kreditur (perusahaan pembiayaan) terhadap objek jaminan fidusia apabila debitur wanprestasi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dampak dari putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusia. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dan kesimpulan dalam karya ilmiah ini adalah terhadap jaminan fidusia yang tidak ada kesepakatan tentang cidera janji (wanprestasi) antara kedua belah pihak dan debitur keberatan menyerahkan secara sukarela objek yang menjadi jaminan fidusia, maka pelaksanaan eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia harus berdasarkan putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap meskipun sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia telah mencantumkan irah-irah sebagai title eksekutorial serta di dalam perjanjian pembiayaan terdapat klausul pelaksanaan parate eksekusi apabila debitur cidera janji (wanprestasi).
The fiducial bail certificate serves as a guarantee of execution when the debitur pledge as fixed in the 1999 article of the constitutional court number 18/ puu-xvii /2019 has changed the concept of the parate of fiduciary execution by the creditors (finance company) to the fiduciary bail on the fiduciary basis if the debtor's interest is felt. The purpose of this study is to know the effects of a constitutional court ruling on the execution of fiduciary bail. The methods in this study use the normative type of legal research. The results and conclusions in this scientific work are against fiduciary guarantees that there is no agreement on an adverse promise between the two sides and the borrower's objection of voluntarily handing over an object which is fiduciary security, Therefore, the execution of a fiduciary security object should be based on a legally strong court ruling even though a fiduciary bail certificate has been ironed as an executive title and in the finance agreement stipulates that the party-executed clause is carried out in the wake of an unspecified execution clause.
1999年《宪法》第18条第18条/PUU-XVII/2019条裁定,债务人因债务人的身份受到伤害而被任命为执行死刑的保证证书。本研究的目的是确定宪法法院判决对受刑受刑的影响。本研究的方法采用了规范法的类型。这项科学工作的结论和结论是基于信任度的保证,信任者和债务人之间没有达成一致的承诺。那么,执行受托人抵押品赎回权的条款必须基于法院的一项具有法律效力的判决,尽管受托人已将阿联酋保证书列为执行头衔,并在金融协议中,在债务人因受伤害而受到惩罚条款。《fiducial保释证书基本美国保证of execution当债务人的誓言美国固定》1999年文章》2019年移交法庭18号puu-xvii /变了parate of execution信托理念》由creditors(金融公司)》是保释在《debtor基地如果信托的信托利益是感觉。这项研究的目的是了解幕后操纵法庭判决的后果。这项研究的方法使用普通的法律研究方法。在这项科学工作中,反对虚情假意的证据是不一致的the execution of a信托安全对象应该改编自非法坚强法庭统治即使a信托保释证书已经被美国ironed an行政头衔和在《party-executed stipulates finance协议那clause是carried out in the wake of an unspecified execution clause。