Seeking the Proper Decommissioning Method in Gross Split Era

Karyadi Junedi
{"title":"Seeking the Proper Decommissioning Method in Gross Split Era","authors":"Karyadi Junedi","doi":"10.2118/193963-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n PT Pertamina Hulu Energi Offshore North-West Java (PHE ONWJ) presently operates a fleet of more than 200 fixed offshore platforms and nearly three quarters of these platforms have been in operation for more than 30 years. Under newly implemented Gross Split Production Sharing Contract (PSC) scheme, PHE ONWJ is driven to seek an effective and efficient method for offshore platform decommissioning. Three offshore decommissioning options, i.e. Total Removal for Onshore Disposal, Total Removal for Rig-to-Reef, and Leave-in-Situ for Mariculture are examined closely. A qualitative evaluation, which involves comparing the total expected cost of each option against its total expected benefits, is conducted in view of decommissioning drivers, i.e. Safety, Environment, Technical, Cost, and Social Impact to other sea user and community. The evaluation of the expected cost of each decommissioning options is presented. The first two options are subjected to high cost activities e.g. platform removal; mobilization and demobilization of derrick barge; and material disposal onshore or reefing site. The Leave-in-Situ for Mariculture option, on the other hand, is not exposed to those activities as it leaves the retired platform on its existing location and turns the structure into the site for offshore cage system fish farming. This is significant because in the Gross Split PSC scheme, PHE ONWJ is expected to be more prudent and focus on cost efficiency. The social impact of the Mariculture method is potentially important considering the rapid growing of global per capita fish consumption and the fact that there are no offshore cage systems fish farming using retired offshore platform in Indonesian waters or even Southeast area yet. The suitability of the proposed mariculture site of Offshore North West Java waters is further evaluated against the guidelines from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The Mariculture method can be not only the most cost efficient solution for offshore platform decommissioning, but also providing alternative technique to increase marine fish production.","PeriodicalId":437819,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, December 03, 2018","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, December 03, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193963-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PT Pertamina Hulu Energi Offshore North-West Java (PHE ONWJ) presently operates a fleet of more than 200 fixed offshore platforms and nearly three quarters of these platforms have been in operation for more than 30 years. Under newly implemented Gross Split Production Sharing Contract (PSC) scheme, PHE ONWJ is driven to seek an effective and efficient method for offshore platform decommissioning. Three offshore decommissioning options, i.e. Total Removal for Onshore Disposal, Total Removal for Rig-to-Reef, and Leave-in-Situ for Mariculture are examined closely. A qualitative evaluation, which involves comparing the total expected cost of each option against its total expected benefits, is conducted in view of decommissioning drivers, i.e. Safety, Environment, Technical, Cost, and Social Impact to other sea user and community. The evaluation of the expected cost of each decommissioning options is presented. The first two options are subjected to high cost activities e.g. platform removal; mobilization and demobilization of derrick barge; and material disposal onshore or reefing site. The Leave-in-Situ for Mariculture option, on the other hand, is not exposed to those activities as it leaves the retired platform on its existing location and turns the structure into the site for offshore cage system fish farming. This is significant because in the Gross Split PSC scheme, PHE ONWJ is expected to be more prudent and focus on cost efficiency. The social impact of the Mariculture method is potentially important considering the rapid growing of global per capita fish consumption and the fact that there are no offshore cage systems fish farming using retired offshore platform in Indonesian waters or even Southeast area yet. The suitability of the proposed mariculture site of Offshore North West Java waters is further evaluated against the guidelines from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The Mariculture method can be not only the most cost efficient solution for offshore platform decommissioning, but also providing alternative technique to increase marine fish production.
在大分裂时代寻求合适的退役方法
PT Pertamina Hulu Energi Offshore northwest Java (PHE ONWJ)目前运营着200多个固定海上平台,其中近四分之三的平台已经运行了30多年。在新实施的总分割产量共享合同(PSC)计划下,PHE ONWJ致力于寻求一种有效、高效的海上平台退役方法。对三种海上退役方案进行了仔细的研究,即陆地处置的全部移除,钻井平台到珊瑚礁的全部移除,以及留在原地进行海水养殖。考虑到退役的驱动因素,即安全、环境、技术、成本和对其他海上用户和社区的社会影响,进行定性评估,包括比较每个选项的总预期成本与其总预期效益。对各退役方案的预期成本进行了评估。前两种方案涉及高成本活动,例如移除平台;井架驳船的动员和复员;以及岸上或珊瑚礁的材料处置。另一方面,离开原位进行海水养殖的方案不受这些活动的影响,因为它离开了现有位置的退役平台,将结构变成了海上网箱系统养鱼的场所。这一点很重要,因为在Gross Split PSC方案中,PHE ONWJ预计会更加谨慎,并专注于成本效率。考虑到全球人均鱼类消费量的快速增长,以及印度尼西亚水域甚至东南地区还没有使用退役海上平台的海上网箱系统进行鱼类养殖,海水养殖方法的社会影响可能是重要的。根据联合国粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)的指导方针,进一步评估了拟议的西北爪哇近海海水养殖场的适宜性。海水养殖方法不仅是海上平台退役最具成本效益的解决方案,而且还提供了增加海洋鱼类产量的替代技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信