Electoral Politics in Ghana’s 4th Republic (1992-2016) and its Implications on Future Elections

Baffour Agyeman Prempeh Boakye
{"title":"Electoral Politics in Ghana’s 4th Republic (1992-2016) and its Implications on Future Elections","authors":"Baffour Agyeman Prempeh Boakye","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3202431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seven successive democratic elections conducted in Ghana between 1992 and 2016 has resulted in peaceful alternation of power between two major political parties; namely the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and the National Democratic Congress (NDC) in what Huntington refers to as the turn over test. Whiles this remains a major step in consolidating multiparty democracy and a model for Africa, Boafo-Arthur has argued that, “elections in most African countries remains very difficult to predict due to several social factors like high levels of illiteracy, ethnic proclivities, religious attachment and personalities” (Boafo-Arthur, 2006:1). Looking at the electoral politics of Ghana since 1992, it would be observed that, different factors has accounted to the electoral dynamics as well as electoral victories and defeats. Some political pundits have attributed these dynamics to issues of ethnic bloc voting, Political power capture by the two dominant political parties among other myriads factors. This research paper investigates electoral dynamics of Ghana since 1992, the major determinants of elections, some interesting established electoral traditions in Ghana and its implications on future elections.","PeriodicalId":117783,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3202431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Seven successive democratic elections conducted in Ghana between 1992 and 2016 has resulted in peaceful alternation of power between two major political parties; namely the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and the National Democratic Congress (NDC) in what Huntington refers to as the turn over test. Whiles this remains a major step in consolidating multiparty democracy and a model for Africa, Boafo-Arthur has argued that, “elections in most African countries remains very difficult to predict due to several social factors like high levels of illiteracy, ethnic proclivities, religious attachment and personalities” (Boafo-Arthur, 2006:1). Looking at the electoral politics of Ghana since 1992, it would be observed that, different factors has accounted to the electoral dynamics as well as electoral victories and defeats. Some political pundits have attributed these dynamics to issues of ethnic bloc voting, Political power capture by the two dominant political parties among other myriads factors. This research paper investigates electoral dynamics of Ghana since 1992, the major determinants of elections, some interesting established electoral traditions in Ghana and its implications on future elections.
加纳第四共和国的选举政治(1992-2016)及其对未来选举的影响
1992年至2016年期间,加纳连续举行了七次民主选举,导致两个主要政党之间的权力和平交替;即新爱国党(NPP)和全国民主大会党(NDC),亨廷顿称之为“移交测试”。虽然这仍然是巩固多党民主的重要一步,也是非洲的典范,但Boafo-Arthur认为,“大多数非洲国家的选举仍然很难预测,这是由于几个社会因素,如高文盲率、种族倾向、宗教依恋和个性”(Boafo-Arthur, 2006:1)。回顾1992年以来加纳的选举政治,可以看到,不同的因素影响了选举动态以及选举的胜利和失败。一些政治专家将这种动态归因于民族集团投票问题、两个主要政党夺取政治权力以及其他无数因素。本研究论文调查了自1992年以来加纳的选举动态,选举的主要决定因素,加纳一些有趣的既定选举传统及其对未来选举的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信