LEGIBILITY OF TRAFFIC WARNING SIGNS BY DRIVERS

Chang-Franw Lee, Yu-Hsing Chuang, Min-Jho Young
{"title":"LEGIBILITY OF TRAFFIC WARNING SIGNS BY DRIVERS","authors":"Chang-Franw Lee, Yu-Hsing Chuang, Min-Jho Young","doi":"10.11247/JSSDJ.60.2_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the minimum sizes of traffic signs that young and elderly drivers could recognize and also to see if the distance for recognizing those signs are more than the required minimum distances of MOTC (Ministry of Transportation and Communications, R.O.C) regulation. Experiments were carried out in a laboratory. Twenty-four elderly and young subjects separately participated in the study. The method of limits was employed to find the absolute threshold. In the experiment, various traffic signs were displayed on the screen with the size enlarging from small to big until participants could recognize the sign. The size of the recognized stimulus was recorded and then transformed into visual angles. The results show that the legibility capabilities of elderly drivers are indeed poorer than young subjects. Average visual angle of elderly group is about 1.6 times of that of young group. Ideogram signs can be better recognized by all subjects compared to the pictogram ones. When at speed limit of 90 km/hr, the minimum distance for recognizing all the signs cannot satisfy the requirements of the regulation. Based on the results needed sign sizes and changing sign location are proposed. Keyword: The Elderly; Traffic Signs; Legibility; Warning Signs; Ideogram.","PeriodicalId":383659,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11247/JSSDJ.60.2_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the minimum sizes of traffic signs that young and elderly drivers could recognize and also to see if the distance for recognizing those signs are more than the required minimum distances of MOTC (Ministry of Transportation and Communications, R.O.C) regulation. Experiments were carried out in a laboratory. Twenty-four elderly and young subjects separately participated in the study. The method of limits was employed to find the absolute threshold. In the experiment, various traffic signs were displayed on the screen with the size enlarging from small to big until participants could recognize the sign. The size of the recognized stimulus was recorded and then transformed into visual angles. The results show that the legibility capabilities of elderly drivers are indeed poorer than young subjects. Average visual angle of elderly group is about 1.6 times of that of young group. Ideogram signs can be better recognized by all subjects compared to the pictogram ones. When at speed limit of 90 km/hr, the minimum distance for recognizing all the signs cannot satisfy the requirements of the regulation. Based on the results needed sign sizes and changing sign location are proposed. Keyword: The Elderly; Traffic Signs; Legibility; Warning Signs; Ideogram.
司机对交通警告标志的易读性
本研究旨在探讨年轻与年老驾驶人所能辨识的最小交通标志尺寸,以及辨识这些标志的距离是否超过交通部规定的最小距离。实验是在实验室里进行的。24名老年人和年轻人分别参加了这项研究。采用极限法求绝对阈值。在实验中,屏幕上显示各种交通标志,大小从小到大,直到参与者能够识别这些标志。被识别的刺激的大小被记录下来,然后转换成视觉角度。结果表明,老年驾驶员的阅读能力确实比年轻驾驶员差。老年人的平均视角约为年轻人的1.6倍。与象形文字相比,表意文字可以更好地被所有受试者识别。在限速90公里/小时时,识别所有标志的最小距离不能满足规定要求。在此基础上提出了标识尺寸和标识位置变化的建议。关键词:老年人;交通标志;易读性;警告标志;表意文字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信