Developing IoT systems and devices for trust by users with disabilities

D. Wittkower, Stephanie J. Blackmon, Krzysztof J. Rechowicz, H. Herdegen
{"title":"Developing IoT systems and devices for trust by users with disabilities","authors":"D. Wittkower, Stephanie J. Blackmon, Krzysztof J. Rechowicz, H. Herdegen","doi":"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This session will present results from an interdisciplinary mixed-methods research project on trust and access in the use of Internet of Things (IoT) devices by disabled persons. The year-long project is directed by professors in Philosophy, Education, and Modeling and Simulation, and will produce a trust framework as well as a prototype app. This presentation will focus on research outcomes about how designers and engineers can build IoT systems and devices that are most likely to be trusted by users with disabilities. The empirical component of the project was situated in universal design (UD) and universal design learning (UDL), and included 63 survey responses, three focus groups, and 58 journals, with the qualitative data being collected and analyzed according to constructivist grounded theory. Oriented by this empirical research, we conducted a literature review of trust discourses in HCI and engineering publication, as well as a review of philosophical work on epistemological and ethical issues in experiences and practices of trust. In this presentation, we will present a primer for abled engineers on the lived experience of disability as a design context relevant to technology adoption. This will address the medical and social model of disability, an analysis of solutionism as a barrier to effective design for disabled users, and a typology of the most relevant sorts of trust for design for disabled users (viz. trust as reliability, trust as veracity, and trust as stewardship), developed through a post-phenomenological analysis of UX in tech interfaces paradigmatic of disabled lived experience. We will also provide an overview of our trust framework which avoids the solutionist implications of providing a checklist or series of principles by instead providing guiding processes and questions.","PeriodicalId":314239,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This session will present results from an interdisciplinary mixed-methods research project on trust and access in the use of Internet of Things (IoT) devices by disabled persons. The year-long project is directed by professors in Philosophy, Education, and Modeling and Simulation, and will produce a trust framework as well as a prototype app. This presentation will focus on research outcomes about how designers and engineers can build IoT systems and devices that are most likely to be trusted by users with disabilities. The empirical component of the project was situated in universal design (UD) and universal design learning (UDL), and included 63 survey responses, three focus groups, and 58 journals, with the qualitative data being collected and analyzed according to constructivist grounded theory. Oriented by this empirical research, we conducted a literature review of trust discourses in HCI and engineering publication, as well as a review of philosophical work on epistemological and ethical issues in experiences and practices of trust. In this presentation, we will present a primer for abled engineers on the lived experience of disability as a design context relevant to technology adoption. This will address the medical and social model of disability, an analysis of solutionism as a barrier to effective design for disabled users, and a typology of the most relevant sorts of trust for design for disabled users (viz. trust as reliability, trust as veracity, and trust as stewardship), developed through a post-phenomenological analysis of UX in tech interfaces paradigmatic of disabled lived experience. We will also provide an overview of our trust framework which avoids the solutionist implications of providing a checklist or series of principles by instead providing guiding processes and questions.
开发物联网系统和设备,以获得残疾用户的信任
本次会议将介绍一个跨学科混合方法研究项目的结果,该项目是关于残疾人使用物联网(IoT)设备时的信任和访问。这个为期一年的项目由哲学、教育和建模与仿真的教授指导,并将产生一个信任框架以及一个原型应用程序。本次演讲将重点关注设计师和工程师如何构建最有可能被残疾用户信任的物联网系统和设备的研究成果。该项目的实证部分位于通用设计(UD)和通用设计学习(UDL)领域,包括63份调查问卷、3个焦点小组和58份期刊,并根据建构主义理论收集和分析定性数据。在此实证研究的指导下,我们对HCI和工程出版物中的信任话语进行了文献回顾,并对信任经验和实践中关于认识论和伦理问题的哲学工作进行了回顾。在这次演讲中,我们将为残疾工程师介绍残疾的生活经验,并将其作为与技术采用相关的设计背景。本文将讨论残疾的医学和社会模型,分析作为残疾用户有效设计障碍的解决方案主义,以及残疾用户设计中最相关的信任类型(即信任作为可靠性,信任作为真实性,信任作为管理),这些都是通过对技术界面中的用户体验范例的后现象学分析而发展起来的。我们还将概述我们的信任框架,该框架通过提供指导性过程和问题来避免提供清单或一系列原则的解决主义含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信