Authoritarian trends and their continuity in Sri Lankan politics: A study of operationalizing of authoritarianism from 2005 to 2015 Period

Upul Abeyrathne, Upali Pannilage, N. Ranawaka
{"title":"Authoritarian trends and their continuity in Sri Lankan politics: A study of operationalizing of authoritarianism from 2005 to 2015 Period","authors":"Upul Abeyrathne, Upali Pannilage, N. Ranawaka","doi":"10.5897/AJPSIR2016.0946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study talks about the authoritarian trends and their continuity in Sri Lankan Politics since 2005. Sri Lanka was considered a model Third World Democracy at the initial phase of political independence from colonial rule. However, the country has been converted into a constitutionally established authoritarian type regime through constitution making exercise. This trend was increased in galloping speed with Mahinda Rajapakshe regimes since 2005 to 2015. The defeat of Rajapakshe regime in an unexpected electoral defeat where election was calculated as an opportunity to extend the regime with the possibility of eroding democratic values forever made the possibility of democracy in the country a clear sign. The regime went beyond authoritarianism type and embraced many features of a totalitarian type regime. However, totalitarian trends long last event after initial defeat of such regimes. This trend remains largely unexplored and non-theorized within the Sri Lankan scholarship. The objective of the present study was to fill the afoermentioned gap in the scholarship. The methodology of the study has been the observations made by the three authors for the said period and they have been critically reflected upon and presented. The study concluded that the biggest political challenge ahead of Sri Lanka is to do away with the ethnic consciousness nurtured among the majority Sinhalese as a political tool of maintaining totalitarian culture and those legacies need to be address in harnessing democratic culture \n \n Key words: Authoritarianism, totalitarian, Mahinda Rajapakshe, Sri Lanka, Third World totalitarian.","PeriodicalId":120632,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Political Science and International Relations","volume":"27 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Political Science and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2016.0946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study talks about the authoritarian trends and their continuity in Sri Lankan Politics since 2005. Sri Lanka was considered a model Third World Democracy at the initial phase of political independence from colonial rule. However, the country has been converted into a constitutionally established authoritarian type regime through constitution making exercise. This trend was increased in galloping speed with Mahinda Rajapakshe regimes since 2005 to 2015. The defeat of Rajapakshe regime in an unexpected electoral defeat where election was calculated as an opportunity to extend the regime with the possibility of eroding democratic values forever made the possibility of democracy in the country a clear sign. The regime went beyond authoritarianism type and embraced many features of a totalitarian type regime. However, totalitarian trends long last event after initial defeat of such regimes. This trend remains largely unexplored and non-theorized within the Sri Lankan scholarship. The objective of the present study was to fill the afoermentioned gap in the scholarship. The methodology of the study has been the observations made by the three authors for the said period and they have been critically reflected upon and presented. The study concluded that the biggest political challenge ahead of Sri Lanka is to do away with the ethnic consciousness nurtured among the majority Sinhalese as a political tool of maintaining totalitarian culture and those legacies need to be address in harnessing democratic culture Key words: Authoritarianism, totalitarian, Mahinda Rajapakshe, Sri Lanka, Third World totalitarian.
斯里兰卡政治中的威权主义趋势及其连续性:2005年至2015年期间威权主义运作化研究
本研究讨论自2005年以来斯里兰卡政治中的威权主义趋势及其连续性。在摆脱殖民统治的政治独立初期,斯里兰卡被认为是第三世界民主的典范。但是,通过制宪运动,韩国已经转变为宪法确立的独裁型政权。从2005年到2015年,随着马欣达·拉贾帕克什(Mahinda Rajapakshe)政权的执政,这一趋势加速发展。拉贾帕克什政权在一次出人意料的选举失败中被击败,这次选举被认为是一个延长政权的机会,有可能永远侵蚀民主价值观,这使该国民主的可能性成为一个明确的迹象。该政权超越了威权主义类型,并具有极权主义类型政权的许多特征。然而,极权主义趋势在这些政权最初被打败后,就会长期持续下去。在斯里兰卡学术界,这一趋势在很大程度上仍未被探索和理论化。本研究旨在填补上述学术空白。该研究的方法是三位作者在上述时期所作的观察,并对其进行了批判性反思和提出。该研究得出结论,斯里兰卡面临的最大政治挑战是消除在多数僧伽罗人中培养的民族意识,这种意识是维持极权主义文化的政治工具,这些遗产需要在利用民主文化时得到解决。关键词:威权主义,极权主义,马欣达·拉贾帕克什,斯里兰卡,第三世界极权主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信