Flowmeter Selection for Hygienic Fluid Handling Applications Using Trade-off Analysis

Fuhua Jen, Ryan Collin De Leon
{"title":"Flowmeter Selection for Hygienic Fluid Handling Applications Using Trade-off Analysis","authors":"Fuhua Jen, Ryan Collin De Leon","doi":"10.1109/IS3C50286.2020.00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several types of flowmeters commercially available in the market today. The researchers found ultrasonic and electromagnetic flowmeters the viable alternatives for hygienic fluid handling applications. These types of flowmeters offer full bore un-obstructed pipe, allowing undisturbed fluid when measuring fluid flow. This key feature made these flowmeters easy to clean and maintain. Applications like pharmaceuticals, food and beverages, ink refilling, and the like require this technology for they need no impurities to the fluid they are handling. Hence, the researchers used Trade-off analysis to select between the two viable alternatives the most suitable for hygienic fluid handling like the above-mentioned applications. The researchers selected Compatibility, Accuracy and Repeatability, and Cost as the criteria in the decision-making process. By using the Pairwise weighing method, the researchers come up with each criterion's respective weights of 74.4%, 10.6%, and 15%. With an overall performance of 57.83%, the researchers concluded that between the two alternatives, the ultrasonic flowmeter is the most suitable for hygienic fluid handling applications.","PeriodicalId":143430,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IS3C50286.2020.00071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several types of flowmeters commercially available in the market today. The researchers found ultrasonic and electromagnetic flowmeters the viable alternatives for hygienic fluid handling applications. These types of flowmeters offer full bore un-obstructed pipe, allowing undisturbed fluid when measuring fluid flow. This key feature made these flowmeters easy to clean and maintain. Applications like pharmaceuticals, food and beverages, ink refilling, and the like require this technology for they need no impurities to the fluid they are handling. Hence, the researchers used Trade-off analysis to select between the two viable alternatives the most suitable for hygienic fluid handling like the above-mentioned applications. The researchers selected Compatibility, Accuracy and Repeatability, and Cost as the criteria in the decision-making process. By using the Pairwise weighing method, the researchers come up with each criterion's respective weights of 74.4%, 10.6%, and 15%. With an overall performance of 57.83%, the researchers concluded that between the two alternatives, the ultrasonic flowmeter is the most suitable for hygienic fluid handling applications.
流量计选择卫生流体处理应用使用权衡分析
今天市场上有几种类型的商业流量计。研究人员发现超声波和电磁流量计是卫生流体处理应用的可行替代方案。这些类型的流量计提供全通径无阻塞管道,在测量流体流量时允许不受干扰的流体。这一关键特点使这些流量计易于清洁和维护。制药、食品和饮料、油墨填充等应用需要这种技术,因为它们需要处理的流体中没有杂质。因此,研究人员使用权衡分析在两种可行的替代方案中选择最适合卫生液体处理的方案,如上述应用。研究人员选择了兼容性、准确性和重复性以及成本作为决策过程的标准。通过使用成对加权法,研究人员得出了每个标准各自的权重分别为74.4%,10.6%和15%。研究人员得出结论,在两种替代方案中,超声波流量计的总体性能为57.83%,最适合卫生流体处理应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信