Riba According to Sjafrudin Prawiranegara (1911 – 1989) and Muhammad Syafii Antonio (1967) (Critical Comparative Analysis of Islamic Legal Theory Perspective)

Faozi Latif
{"title":"Riba According to Sjafrudin Prawiranegara (1911 – 1989) and Muhammad Syafii Antonio (1967) (Critical Comparative Analysis of Islamic Legal Theory Perspective)","authors":"Faozi Latif","doi":"10.24090/icontrees.2022.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sjafrudin Prawiranegara and Syafii Antonio are two influential figures of Islamic economists in Indonesia. Both are considered to represent two different poles of Islamic economics. Sjafrudin represented critical thinking, while Syafii Antonio represented mainstream thinking. This paper was made with a theory approach istinbat} law. Based on an analysis with this approach, it was revealed that Sjafrudin Prawiranegara tended to interpret usury philosophically, while Syafii Antonio tended to emphasize more on the linguistic aspects (bayani) as the views of the main religious scholars. According to Syafrudin Riba is all the profits obtained based on transactions or agreements in which one party is abusing his strong economic position to take advantage that crosses the line from his weak counterpart. While Syafii Antonio equates usury with interest which means more than credit.","PeriodicalId":156496,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of Saizu International Conference on Transdisciplinary Religious Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of Saizu International Conference on Transdisciplinary Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/icontrees.2022.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sjafrudin Prawiranegara and Syafii Antonio are two influential figures of Islamic economists in Indonesia. Both are considered to represent two different poles of Islamic economics. Sjafrudin represented critical thinking, while Syafii Antonio represented mainstream thinking. This paper was made with a theory approach istinbat} law. Based on an analysis with this approach, it was revealed that Sjafrudin Prawiranegara tended to interpret usury philosophically, while Syafii Antonio tended to emphasize more on the linguistic aspects (bayani) as the views of the main religious scholars. According to Syafrudin Riba is all the profits obtained based on transactions or agreements in which one party is abusing his strong economic position to take advantage that crosses the line from his weak counterpart. While Syafii Antonio equates usury with interest which means more than credit.
根据Sjafrudin Prawiranegara(1911 - 1989)和Muhammad Syafii Antonio(1967)(伊斯兰法律理论视角的批判性比较分析)
Sjafrudin Prawiranegara和Syafii Antonio是印尼两位颇具影响力的伊斯兰经济学家。两者都被认为代表了伊斯兰经济学的两个不同的极端。Sjafrudin代表批判性思维,而Syafii Antonio代表主流思维。本文是用一种理论方法进行的。基于这一方法的分析,我们发现Sjafrudin Prawiranegara倾向于哲学地解释高利贷,而Syafii Antonio倾向于更多地强调语言方面(bayani)作为主要宗教学者的观点。根据Syafrudin Riba的说法,所有利润都是基于交易或协议而获得的,其中一方滥用其强大的经济地位,从弱势的对手那里获得利益。而亚菲·安东尼奥将高利贷等同于利息,这比信用更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信