A System Approach for Creating Employee-Oriented Quality Control Loops in Production for Smart Failure Management System in SMEs

Turgut Refik Caglar, R. Jochem
{"title":"A System Approach for Creating Employee-Oriented Quality Control Loops in\n Production for Smart Failure Management System in SMEs","authors":"Turgut Refik Caglar, R. Jochem","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basis of effective processes for failure elimination and prevention\n is formed by quality control loops, which aim to detect and analyse\n deviations/failures from quality specifications and to take appropriate\n measures to correct them in time. Quality methods can either be used as\n controllers (e.g. statistical process control, failure mode and effects\n analysis) in quality control loops or as a special form of these (e.g.\n Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, 8D Report, Six Sigma methodology). For the\n successful introduction of quality control loops, relevant data should be\n systematically collected, evaluated and interpreted in order to derive\n targeted measures as a consequence. Small and Medium Enterprises (SME)\n rarely have a systematic quality management system for the comprehensive\n collection and analysis of quality data and their embedding in quality\n control loops. On the other hand, the increasing complexity of production\n systems requires the digitalisation and expansion of quality control loops\n already in use, although they have delivered good results so far. At this\n point, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a future key technology that holds\n significant potential for future value creation. AI-driven data science\n methods (e.g. machine learning) enable the explanation of complex,\n correlationally directed relationships in large amounts of data and\n accordingly contribute to process improvement as well as failure management.\n In this context, the expansion of quality control loops through digitalised\n elements and AI methods can help to achieve a smart failure management\n system.In terms of content, failure management also includes the term\n \"failure prevention\" and is not a one-time process, but a continuous process\n that requires the motivation and understanding of all employees.\n Furthermore, the concept of \"Total Productive Management\" also aims at\n defect-free products and effective production processes and involves all\n employees in improvement activities to maximise plant efficiency and\n minimise losses. At this point, SMEs need intelligent, digital and\n employee-oriented error management systems. The core objective of the paper\n is to present the conceptual development of a smart failure management\n system that is in a continuous learning process through interaction with the\n employee and in this way learns human cognitive problem-solving skills. This\n approach is intended to detect failures on the shop floor at an early stage\n in order to identify possible causes of problems and derive measures. If the\n defect type, cause or measure are not known, the system suggests suitable\n methods/tools of quality and data science to support employees in problem\n solving process. In order for the assistance system to have human cognitive\n problem-solving capabilities, the system must be trained in advance by\n qualified employees who have extensive technical and methodological\n knowledge and can apply it confidently. With this in mind, the failure\n management system is expanded to include two additional subsystems. Firstly,\n the less competent employees must be taught missing methodological knowledge\n on the basis of digital learning methods. Then, the learning phase is\n followed by the employee training, in which the employee is supported\n digitally and dialogue-based in the selection and implementation of methods\n as well as the interpretation of results.","PeriodicalId":269162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The basis of effective processes for failure elimination and prevention is formed by quality control loops, which aim to detect and analyse deviations/failures from quality specifications and to take appropriate measures to correct them in time. Quality methods can either be used as controllers (e.g. statistical process control, failure mode and effects analysis) in quality control loops or as a special form of these (e.g. Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, 8D Report, Six Sigma methodology). For the successful introduction of quality control loops, relevant data should be systematically collected, evaluated and interpreted in order to derive targeted measures as a consequence. Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) rarely have a systematic quality management system for the comprehensive collection and analysis of quality data and their embedding in quality control loops. On the other hand, the increasing complexity of production systems requires the digitalisation and expansion of quality control loops already in use, although they have delivered good results so far. At this point, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a future key technology that holds significant potential for future value creation. AI-driven data science methods (e.g. machine learning) enable the explanation of complex, correlationally directed relationships in large amounts of data and accordingly contribute to process improvement as well as failure management. In this context, the expansion of quality control loops through digitalised elements and AI methods can help to achieve a smart failure management system.In terms of content, failure management also includes the term "failure prevention" and is not a one-time process, but a continuous process that requires the motivation and understanding of all employees. Furthermore, the concept of "Total Productive Management" also aims at defect-free products and effective production processes and involves all employees in improvement activities to maximise plant efficiency and minimise losses. At this point, SMEs need intelligent, digital and employee-oriented error management systems. The core objective of the paper is to present the conceptual development of a smart failure management system that is in a continuous learning process through interaction with the employee and in this way learns human cognitive problem-solving skills. This approach is intended to detect failures on the shop floor at an early stage in order to identify possible causes of problems and derive measures. If the defect type, cause or measure are not known, the system suggests suitable methods/tools of quality and data science to support employees in problem solving process. In order for the assistance system to have human cognitive problem-solving capabilities, the system must be trained in advance by qualified employees who have extensive technical and methodological knowledge and can apply it confidently. With this in mind, the failure management system is expanded to include two additional subsystems. Firstly, the less competent employees must be taught missing methodological knowledge on the basis of digital learning methods. Then, the learning phase is followed by the employee training, in which the employee is supported digitally and dialogue-based in the selection and implementation of methods as well as the interpretation of results.
中小企业智能故障管理系统中以员工为导向的生产质量控制循环的系统方法
有效的故障消除和预防过程的基础是由质量控制回路构成的,其目的是检测和分析与质量规范的偏差/故障,并采取适当的措施及时纠正。质量方法既可以作为质量控制循环中的控制器(如统计过程控制、失效模式和影响分析),也可以作为它们的特殊形式(如计划-执行-检查-行动循环、8D报告、六西格玛方法)。为了成功地引入质量控制循环,应该系统地收集、评价和解释相关数据,以便得出有针对性的措施。中小型企业很少有系统的质量管理系统来全面收集和分析质量数据并将其嵌入质量控制循环。另一方面,生产系统日益复杂,需要数字化和扩展已经使用的质量控制循环,尽管迄今为止它们已经取得了良好的效果。在这一点上,人工智能(AI)是未来的关键技术,具有巨大的未来价值创造潜力。人工智能驱动的数据科学方法(如机器学习)能够解释大量数据中复杂的、相互指导的关系,从而有助于流程改进和故障管理。在这种情况下,通过数字化元素和人工智能方法扩展质量控制循环可以帮助实现智能故障管理系统。在内容上,故障管理也包括“故障预防”一词,它不是一次性的过程,而是一个持续的过程,需要全体员工的激励和理解。此外,“全面生产管理”的概念也旨在生产无缺陷的产品和有效的生产过程,并让所有员工参与改进活动,以最大限度地提高工厂效率和减少损失。在这一点上,中小企业需要智能化、数字化和面向员工的错误管理系统。本文的核心目标是介绍智能故障管理系统的概念发展,该系统通过与员工的互动处于持续学习过程中,并以这种方式学习人类认知问题解决技能。这种方法的目的是在早期阶段检测车间的故障,以便确定问题的可能原因并得出措施。如果不知道缺陷的类型、原因或措施,系统建议合适的质量和数据科学方法/工具来支持员工解决问题的过程。为了使辅助系统具有人类认知问题解决能力,该系统必须事先由具有广泛技术和方法知识并能够自信地应用的合格员工进行培训。考虑到这一点,故障管理系统被扩展为包括两个额外的子系统。首先,必须在数字化学习方法的基础上,向能力较差的员工传授方法论知识。然后,学习阶段之后是员工培训,在选择和实施方法以及解释结果方面,员工得到数字化和基于对话的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信