A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model of Shariah Compliant Firms in the United States

Asyraf Abdul Halim
{"title":"A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model of Shariah Compliant Firms in the United States","authors":"Asyraf Abdul Halim","doi":"10.22452/ijie.vol15no3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shariah compliant firms operating in an environment with little to no access to a robust Islamic capital market (such as in the United States (US) stock market) will exhibit a consistent bias towards certain corporate financial behaviour. Does this bias subsequently lead to a skewed asset pricing behaviour? To answer this question, this paper investigates the asset pricing behaviour of multiple samples of Shariah compliant firms listed in the US as compared to an overall conventional sample by employing the Fama & French Five-Factor Model. By applying contemporary Shariah stock screening methodology on a sample of all stocks listed in the NYSE, NASDAQ and the IEX from January 2000 to December 2019, this paper shows that asset pricing behaviour differs not only between Shariah compliant and conventional samples, but also amongst Shariah compliant samples themselves. Ultimately, this paper shows that when deriving the appropriate expected return for Shariah compliant portfolios in the US, there are evidence to suggest that the Fama & French Five-Factor model is more suitable compared to the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) since the additional risk premiums show consistent significance across groups of Shariah compliant firms.","PeriodicalId":393532,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Institutions and Economies","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Institutions and Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/ijie.vol15no3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shariah compliant firms operating in an environment with little to no access to a robust Islamic capital market (such as in the United States (US) stock market) will exhibit a consistent bias towards certain corporate financial behaviour. Does this bias subsequently lead to a skewed asset pricing behaviour? To answer this question, this paper investigates the asset pricing behaviour of multiple samples of Shariah compliant firms listed in the US as compared to an overall conventional sample by employing the Fama & French Five-Factor Model. By applying contemporary Shariah stock screening methodology on a sample of all stocks listed in the NYSE, NASDAQ and the IEX from January 2000 to December 2019, this paper shows that asset pricing behaviour differs not only between Shariah compliant and conventional samples, but also amongst Shariah compliant samples themselves. Ultimately, this paper shows that when deriving the appropriate expected return for Shariah compliant portfolios in the US, there are evidence to suggest that the Fama & French Five-Factor model is more suitable compared to the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) since the additional risk premiums show consistent significance across groups of Shariah compliant firms.
符合伊斯兰教法的公司在一个几乎无法进入强大的伊斯兰资本市场(如美国股票市场)的环境中运营,将表现出对某些公司财务行为的一贯偏见。这种偏见随后会导致扭曲的资产定价行为吗?为了回答这个问题,本文采用Fama & French五因素模型,研究了在美国上市的符合伊斯兰教法的公司的多个样本的资产定价行为,与整体传统样本相比。通过对2000年1月至2019年12月期间在纽约证券交易所、纳斯达克和IEX上市的所有股票样本应用现代伊斯兰教法股票筛选方法,本文表明,资产定价行为不仅在符合伊斯兰教法的样本和传统样本之间存在差异,而且在符合伊斯兰教法的样本本身之间也存在差异。最后,本文表明,在推导美国符合伊斯兰教法的投资组合的适当预期回报时,有证据表明,与传统的资本资产定价模型(CAPM)相比,Fama & French五因素模型更合适,因为额外的风险溢价在符合伊斯兰教法的公司群体中表现出一致的显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信