Aurora’s Jakub Böhme in light of the four principles of the Reformation

Bogdan Ferdek
{"title":"Aurora’s Jakub Böhme in light of the four principles of the Reformation","authors":"Bogdan Ferdek","doi":"10.14746/pst.2018.32.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Böhm’s mysticism aroused the opposition of orthodox Lutheranism. Evangelical parish priest of the Peter and Paul church in Görlitz Gregorius Richter suspect a heresy in Aurora and threatened Böhm with banishment. Numerous Aurora texts indicate that Böhme took into account the four principles of the Reformation. Böhm’s Aurora contains the reformational principle the grace itself and the anthropology implied by it, about the non-free will of human being. While in Luther thoughts were dominated by the functional Christology, in the Böhme’s – essential Christology. The essence of this Christology is to call Christ Aurora. From the essential Christology, Böhme, however, derived a functional conclusion, which is the postulate of the following Christ. In contrast to Luther, who focused on the fides qua, Böhme focuses primarily on fides quae. Although Aurora contains numerous references to the Bible, the very title of Böhme’s most famous work is the result of an experience with a tin vessel. Luther would blame Böhme of illumination, that is, the possibility of an internal, omitting the biblical Word, communicating the Spirit of God with human. Böhme was a theosophist, means either theologian and philosopher, in one person. As a theologian, he drew the knowledge from God’s revelation, and as a philosopher he perceived the traces of God in the world. He had a premonition that reason and faith can not contradict themselves, because ultimately they have a common source in God.","PeriodicalId":241712,"journal":{"name":"Poznań Theological Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznań Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pst.2018.32.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Böhm’s mysticism aroused the opposition of orthodox Lutheranism. Evangelical parish priest of the Peter and Paul church in Görlitz Gregorius Richter suspect a heresy in Aurora and threatened Böhm with banishment. Numerous Aurora texts indicate that Böhme took into account the four principles of the Reformation. Böhm’s Aurora contains the reformational principle the grace itself and the anthropology implied by it, about the non-free will of human being. While in Luther thoughts were dominated by the functional Christology, in the Böhme’s – essential Christology. The essence of this Christology is to call Christ Aurora. From the essential Christology, Böhme, however, derived a functional conclusion, which is the postulate of the following Christ. In contrast to Luther, who focused on the fides qua, Böhme focuses primarily on fides quae. Although Aurora contains numerous references to the Bible, the very title of Böhme’s most famous work is the result of an experience with a tin vessel. Luther would blame Böhme of illumination, that is, the possibility of an internal, omitting the biblical Word, communicating the Spirit of God with human. Böhme was a theosophist, means either theologian and philosopher, in one person. As a theologian, he drew the knowledge from God’s revelation, and as a philosopher he perceived the traces of God in the world. He had a premonition that reason and faith can not contradict themselves, because ultimately they have a common source in God.
奥罗拉的雅各伯Böhme根据宗教改革的四项原则
Böhm的神秘主义引起了正统路德教的反对。Görlitz彼得和保罗教堂的福音派教区牧师Gregorius Richter怀疑奥罗拉有异端,并威胁要驱逐Böhm。许多奥罗拉文本表明Böhme考虑到了宗教改革的四个原则。Böhm的《极光》包含了关于人类非自由意志的改革原则、恩典本身及其隐含的人类学。路德的思想以功能基督论为主,而Böhme的思想则以本质基督论为主。这种基督论的本质是称基督为奥罗拉。从本质的基督论,Böhme,然而,推导出一个功能的结论,这是假设以下基督。路德专注于信仰本身,而Böhme则主要关注信仰本身。虽然《奥罗拉》中有许多圣经的典故,但Böhme最著名的作品的标题是一个锡容器的经历的结果。路德会责怪Böhme的光照,也就是说,一种内在的可能性,省略圣经的话语,与人类交流上帝的精神。Böhme是一个神智学者,意思是神学家和哲学家,集于一身。作为神学家,他从上帝的启示中汲取知识;作为哲学家,他在世界上发现了上帝的痕迹。他有一种预感,理性和信仰不能互相矛盾,因为它们最终都有一个共同的源头——上帝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信