Kafka Lives: Consideration of Psychological Wellbeing on Staff under Investigation Procedures in the NHS

Feryad A. Hussain
{"title":"Kafka Lives: Consideration of Psychological Wellbeing on Staff under Investigation Procedures in the NHS","authors":"Feryad A. Hussain","doi":"10.36346/sarjnhc.2022.v04i03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Culture change in the UK National Health Service (NHS) became a national concern following the Francis enquiry (2013) with increasing initiatives to develop models of compassionate management. This call was intended to create an environment to address investigations in the best possible manner creating a nurturing environment for staff and in turn their patients; a truly no-blame culture. Whilst principles of justice and compassionate are intended to underpin staff investigations, our clinical experience at the coal-face in working with Staff under Investigation (SUI) has proved that this is (too often) not the case. SUI often find they have little information about the complaint against them, little communication to clarify and await the outcome in general isolation from organisational or team access, until they are invited to the attend and explain their position. The resultant anxiety and distress mean that they are left traumatised by the investigation procedure itself. This brief paper aims to highlight the avoidable stressors caused by investigation procedures in the UK NHS themselves and aims to highlights aspects of these polices which require greater attention. This in turn would support a beneficial outcome for the investigation procedures overall. Whilst focusing on the UK, the generic processes of investigation have a number of commonalities which allow this information to be applicable to a range of health care services and investigation procedures.","PeriodicalId":381001,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Research Journal of Nursing and Healthcare","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Research Journal of Nursing and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjnhc.2022.v04i03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Culture change in the UK National Health Service (NHS) became a national concern following the Francis enquiry (2013) with increasing initiatives to develop models of compassionate management. This call was intended to create an environment to address investigations in the best possible manner creating a nurturing environment for staff and in turn their patients; a truly no-blame culture. Whilst principles of justice and compassionate are intended to underpin staff investigations, our clinical experience at the coal-face in working with Staff under Investigation (SUI) has proved that this is (too often) not the case. SUI often find they have little information about the complaint against them, little communication to clarify and await the outcome in general isolation from organisational or team access, until they are invited to the attend and explain their position. The resultant anxiety and distress mean that they are left traumatised by the investigation procedure itself. This brief paper aims to highlight the avoidable stressors caused by investigation procedures in the UK NHS themselves and aims to highlights aspects of these polices which require greater attention. This in turn would support a beneficial outcome for the investigation procedures overall. Whilst focusing on the UK, the generic processes of investigation have a number of commonalities which allow this information to be applicable to a range of health care services and investigation procedures.
卡夫卡生活:对NHS调查程序下工作人员心理健康的思考
在弗朗西斯调查(2013年)之后,英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的文化变革成为全国关注的问题,越来越多的举措发展了富有同情心的管理模式。这一呼吁旨在创造一种环境,以尽可能最好的方式解决调查问题,为工作人员和患者创造一个培育环境;真正的不责备文化。虽然公正和富有同情心的原则是为了支持员工调查,但我们在煤矿工作面与被调查员工(SUI)合作的临床经验证明,情况并非如此。SUI经常发现他们几乎没有关于针对他们的投诉的信息,很少有沟通来澄清和等待结果,通常与组织或团队隔离,直到他们被邀请参加并解释他们的立场。由此产生的焦虑和痛苦意味着调查程序本身给他们留下了创伤。这篇简短的论文旨在强调由英国国民保健服务本身的调查程序所造成的可避免的压力源,并旨在突出这些需要更多关注的政策方面。这反过来又会对整个调查程序产生有益的结果。在以联合王国为重点的同时,一般调查程序具有一些共性,使这些信息能够适用于一系列卫生保健服务和调查程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信