Risk assessment in railroad signaling: experience gained and lessons learned

J. Braband
{"title":"Risk assessment in railroad signaling: experience gained and lessons learned","authors":"J. Braband","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2002.981633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A generic framework for risk analysis is presented, comprising the following tasks: system definition, hazard identification, definition of risk tolerability criteria, consequence and loss analysis, and risk assessment. The object of this approach is to derive qualitative and quantitative safety integrity requirements for technological systems. The framework is holistic and covers technological as well as human and operational factors. The framework is compared to other approaches. Three different railroad signaling case studies, that use the same process, but under different circumstances, are presented. The lessons learned from these case studies, which, like the process itself have applications beyond railroad signaling, are reported and discussed.","PeriodicalId":395613,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318)","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2002.981633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A generic framework for risk analysis is presented, comprising the following tasks: system definition, hazard identification, definition of risk tolerability criteria, consequence and loss analysis, and risk assessment. The object of this approach is to derive qualitative and quantitative safety integrity requirements for technological systems. The framework is holistic and covers technological as well as human and operational factors. The framework is compared to other approaches. Three different railroad signaling case studies, that use the same process, but under different circumstances, are presented. The lessons learned from these case studies, which, like the process itself have applications beyond railroad signaling, are reported and discussed.
铁路信号的风险评估:经验与教训
提出了风险分析的一般框架,包括以下任务:系统定义、危害识别、风险承受标准定义、后果和损失分析以及风险评估。该方法的目的是推导出技术系统的定性和定量安全完整性要求。该框架是整体的,涵盖了技术、人员和操作因素。该框架与其他方法进行了比较。三个不同的铁路信号的案例研究,使用相同的过程,但在不同的情况下,提出。报告和讨论了从这些案例研究中获得的经验教训,这些经验教训与过程本身一样,具有铁路信号以外的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信