THE OUTCOMES OF EARLY VERSUS LATE ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE

Anjali Jalan, Osman Musa, Udit Chaudhary
{"title":"THE OUTCOMES OF EARLY VERSUS LATE ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE","authors":"Anjali Jalan, Osman Musa, Udit Chaudhary","doi":"10.24041/ejmr2023.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The best time to reverse an ileostomy is still largely unclear, however, there is growing evidence that delaying ileostomy closure may raise the risk of complications after the operation. The study's goal was to compare the outcomes of early ileostomy closure with late ileostomy closure after surgery. A prospective study was done to evaluate the results of patients who went through early ileostomy closure ( within 6 weeks) to those who had late ileostomy closure (>6 weeks). All patients above 18 years old who had stoma subsequent surgery of bowel both in emergency and elective settings. In this prospective observational study, 60 patients were randomly assigned into two groups by the SNOSE method for closure of ileostomy at different intervals of time: early ileostomy closure (<6 weeks), n=30, and late ileostomy closure (>6 weeks), n=30. During three months, all patients were monitored for surgical complications. Early closure was performed on 30 of the 60 trial participants, with the mean time for closure in the early group being 4 weeks and 7.2 weeks in the late group. The postoperative problems and hospital stay did not vary considerably. In conclusion, based on our experience in both ileostomy closure groups at varied time intervals, the early group within 6 weeks did not increase post-operative problems and morbidity. The systematic assignment of patients with temporary loop stomas to early closure may improve patient well-being. Individualization of the usual approach of reserving patients for long-term stoma care is required, and further study is needed to compare disease-specific closure success.","PeriodicalId":368781,"journal":{"name":"Era's Journal of Medical Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Era's Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24041/ejmr2023.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The best time to reverse an ileostomy is still largely unclear, however, there is growing evidence that delaying ileostomy closure may raise the risk of complications after the operation. The study's goal was to compare the outcomes of early ileostomy closure with late ileostomy closure after surgery. A prospective study was done to evaluate the results of patients who went through early ileostomy closure ( within 6 weeks) to those who had late ileostomy closure (>6 weeks). All patients above 18 years old who had stoma subsequent surgery of bowel both in emergency and elective settings. In this prospective observational study, 60 patients were randomly assigned into two groups by the SNOSE method for closure of ileostomy at different intervals of time: early ileostomy closure (<6 weeks), n=30, and late ileostomy closure (>6 weeks), n=30. During three months, all patients were monitored for surgical complications. Early closure was performed on 30 of the 60 trial participants, with the mean time for closure in the early group being 4 weeks and 7.2 weeks in the late group. The postoperative problems and hospital stay did not vary considerably. In conclusion, based on our experience in both ileostomy closure groups at varied time intervals, the early group within 6 weeks did not increase post-operative problems and morbidity. The systematic assignment of patients with temporary loop stomas to early closure may improve patient well-being. Individualization of the usual approach of reserving patients for long-term stoma care is required, and further study is needed to compare disease-specific closure success.
早期和晚期回肠造口闭合的结果
目前尚不清楚回肠造口手术的最佳时间,然而,越来越多的证据表明,延迟回肠造口手术可能会增加术后并发症的风险。该研究的目的是比较手术后早期回肠造口闭合和晚期回肠造口闭合的结果。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估早期回肠造口(6周内)和晚期回肠造口(>6周)患者的结果。所有年龄在18岁以上,在急诊和择期进行肠造口手术的患者。本前瞻性观察研究将60例患者随机分为两组,采用鼻塞法在不同时间间隔进行回肠造口闭合:早期回肠造口闭合(6周),n=30;在三个月的时间里,对所有患者进行手术并发症监测。60名试验参与者中的30人进行了早期关闭,早期组的平均关闭时间为4周,晚期组为7.2周。术后问题和住院时间没有太大差异。总之,根据我们在不同时间间隔的两组回肠造口闭合的经验,早期组在6周内没有增加术后问题和发病率。系统地分配临时环状造口的患者早期闭合可以改善患者的健康状况。需要对保留患者进行长期造口护理的通常方法进行个体化,并需要进一步研究来比较特定疾病的闭合成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信