The 18th-century scholar who lived region close to Seoul Bok-Hyu Lee(李福休)'s policy to promote Suwon

Mi-sook Hwang
{"title":"The 18th-century scholar who lived region close to Seoul Bok-Hyu Lee(李福休)'s policy to promote Suwon","authors":"Mi-sook Hwang","doi":"10.46823/cahs.2022.56.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bok-Hyu Lee (1729∼1800) was known to the academia originated from the research on 『Haedongakbu(海東樂府)』. Bok-Hyu Lee proposed Gyunyeokbeop(均役法) as an alternative solution to the confusion of the status system caused by the absence of private servants. He insisted that if the central government does not receive Gunpo(軍布) from personal servants, the owner would pay private servant's Gunpo(軍布) instead and maintain the form of serving the master, there would be no loss in the state's financial income and personal servants would not be dissatisfied. Furthermore, he suggested that Yangban(兩班) of Kyunghyang((京鄕, Seoul and local) should be incorporated into Gunjung (軍丁, serviceperson) according to the number of households, and that Yangban(兩班) who do not participate in this should not take the state exam. However, Bok-Hyu Lee's argument can be judged as suggesting an alternative method to maintain the existing status order. Nevertheless, we can see the meaning of the change in the status system regarding the claim of a scholar who is a flawed and stubborn scholar living in the province near the capital. \nResidents of Ilyong·Songdong-myeon(一用·松洞面), who had suffered the inconvenience of paying taxes to Gwangju, wanted to be transferred to Suwon. Bok-Hyu Lee's opinion suggested Songdong-myeon(松洞面) as an alternative to Wangryun-myeon(王倫面), which is convenient to stay in Gwangju, and requested that the convenience of the people should be reconsidered if it is transferred to Suwon. It was pointed out that the installment of the tax would cause harmful effects on the people. \nFurthermore, looking at Bok-Hyu Lee's argument for the theory of Hwaseong fortification, it can be seen that discussions took place regardless of the central government and regions. Bok-Hyu Lee suggested a method that could be implemented by dividing the construction period of Hwaseong into three years, and in the end, the construction of Hwaseong was completed in two years and seven months, some realistic validity of his argument was predicted. \nTherefore, at this time, Bok-Hyu Lee raised arguments on the issues of Jeonbu(田賦), the fortification of Hwaseong, and Gunjung(軍政) which was a reform plan for the low-class people of this era who were almost in ruins due to the excessive and unreasonable system of Jeonse(田税)・ Yoyeok(徭役)・Gunyeok(軍役). And it can be seen as an improvement plan for the development of the Suwon community.","PeriodicalId":318621,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Historical Studies at Chung-Ang University","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Historical Studies at Chung-Ang University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46823/cahs.2022.56.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bok-Hyu Lee (1729∼1800) was known to the academia originated from the research on 『Haedongakbu(海東樂府)』. Bok-Hyu Lee proposed Gyunyeokbeop(均役法) as an alternative solution to the confusion of the status system caused by the absence of private servants. He insisted that if the central government does not receive Gunpo(軍布) from personal servants, the owner would pay private servant's Gunpo(軍布) instead and maintain the form of serving the master, there would be no loss in the state's financial income and personal servants would not be dissatisfied. Furthermore, he suggested that Yangban(兩班) of Kyunghyang((京鄕, Seoul and local) should be incorporated into Gunjung (軍丁, serviceperson) according to the number of households, and that Yangban(兩班) who do not participate in this should not take the state exam. However, Bok-Hyu Lee's argument can be judged as suggesting an alternative method to maintain the existing status order. Nevertheless, we can see the meaning of the change in the status system regarding the claim of a scholar who is a flawed and stubborn scholar living in the province near the capital. Residents of Ilyong·Songdong-myeon(一用·松洞面), who had suffered the inconvenience of paying taxes to Gwangju, wanted to be transferred to Suwon. Bok-Hyu Lee's opinion suggested Songdong-myeon(松洞面) as an alternative to Wangryun-myeon(王倫面), which is convenient to stay in Gwangju, and requested that the convenience of the people should be reconsidered if it is transferred to Suwon. It was pointed out that the installment of the tax would cause harmful effects on the people. Furthermore, looking at Bok-Hyu Lee's argument for the theory of Hwaseong fortification, it can be seen that discussions took place regardless of the central government and regions. Bok-Hyu Lee suggested a method that could be implemented by dividing the construction period of Hwaseong into three years, and in the end, the construction of Hwaseong was completed in two years and seven months, some realistic validity of his argument was predicted. Therefore, at this time, Bok-Hyu Lee raised arguments on the issues of Jeonbu(田賦), the fortification of Hwaseong, and Gunjung(軍政) which was a reform plan for the low-class people of this era who were almost in ruins due to the excessive and unreasonable system of Jeonse(田税)・ Yoyeok(徭役)・Gunyeok(軍役). And it can be seen as an improvement plan for the development of the Suwon community.
18世纪住在首尔附近地区的学者李福熙提倡水原的政策
李福贤(1729 ~ 1800年)因对《海东学籍》的研究而被学术界所熟知。李福贤提出了“均律法”,作为解决因没有私人仆人而造成的身份制度混乱的另一种解决方案。他坚持认为,如果中央政府不从私人仆人那里收取军饷,主人将支付私人仆人的军饷,并保持为主人服务的形式,国家的财政收入不会损失,私人仆人也不会不满。此外,他还建议将京乡(汉城和地方)的阳班按户数编入军中(官兵),不参加的阳班不参加国家考试。但是,李福贤的主张可以被认为是提出了维持现有地位秩序的另一种方法。然而,我们可以从一个住在首都附近的地方的有缺陷和固执的学者的主张中看出地位制度变化的意义。因在光州纳税而感到不便的一勇·松东面居民们,希望搬到水原。李福贤的意见是,作为适合留在光州的旺润面的替代方案,选择松东面,并要求如果将其转移到水原,应重新考虑国民的便利性。有人指出,分期征税会给国民带来不良影响。此外,从李福孝对华城设防理论的论述中可以看出,无论中央政府还是地区,都进行了讨论。李福贤提出了将华城的建设时间分成3年,并最终以2年零7个月的时间完成建设的方案,这一主张具有一定的现实合理性。因此,在这个时候,李福贤提出了关于全府(),华城的防御工事和Gunjung()问题的争论,这是一项针对这个时代的下层人民的改革计划,这些人由于全府()·Yoyeok(徭)·Gunyeok()的过度和不合理的制度几乎处于废墟之中。这可以看作是水原社区发展的改善计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信