The value of assessing case difficulty and its effect on endodontic iatrogenic errors: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Ruaa A Alamoudi, Afrah H Alharbi, G. Farie, O. Fahim
{"title":"The value of assessing case difficulty and its effect on endodontic iatrogenic errors: a retrospective cross-sectional study","authors":"Ruaa A Alamoudi, Afrah H Alharbi, G. Farie, O. Fahim","doi":"10.1080/19932820.2019.1688916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The American Association of Endodontists (AAE) released a case difficulty assessment form to help general dentists and students treat cases within their expertise or refer advanced cases to reduce the risk of iatrogenic errors. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of iatrogenic complications after the use of the case difficulty assessment form. Arandom sample of 1000 cases that received root canal treatment in undergraduate clinics during the academicyear (2016–2017) was selected. Case difficulty assessment was made for each case before treatment onset. Once the case was approved for treatment in the undergraduate clinics, the endodontic treatments were performed following the standard procedure the endodontic department of the Dentistry School of King Abdulaziz University mandates. Digital radiographs were obtained during routine root canal treatment and were evaluated by four observers to detect any iatrogenic errors, after which the data were analyzed statistically. Iatrogenic errors were correlated significantly with case difficulty (p= 0.003), and were detected in 22.1% of all teeth treated in the undergraduate clinics. Underfilling accounted for the highestpercent of errors detected (8.4%), followed by ledge formation (4.2%). Molar teeth had the highest frequency of errors, and mesio-buccal roots of maxillary molars showed the highest percentage of errors. The AAE developed asignificantly useful tool to determine the difficulty of each case treated in undergraduate clinics, and following their recommendations will minimize the risk of iatrogenic errors.","PeriodicalId":256060,"journal":{"name":"The Libyan Journal of Medicine","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Libyan Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2019.1688916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT The American Association of Endodontists (AAE) released a case difficulty assessment form to help general dentists and students treat cases within their expertise or refer advanced cases to reduce the risk of iatrogenic errors. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of iatrogenic complications after the use of the case difficulty assessment form. Arandom sample of 1000 cases that received root canal treatment in undergraduate clinics during the academicyear (2016–2017) was selected. Case difficulty assessment was made for each case before treatment onset. Once the case was approved for treatment in the undergraduate clinics, the endodontic treatments were performed following the standard procedure the endodontic department of the Dentistry School of King Abdulaziz University mandates. Digital radiographs were obtained during routine root canal treatment and were evaluated by four observers to detect any iatrogenic errors, after which the data were analyzed statistically. Iatrogenic errors were correlated significantly with case difficulty (p= 0.003), and were detected in 22.1% of all teeth treated in the undergraduate clinics. Underfilling accounted for the highestpercent of errors detected (8.4%), followed by ledge formation (4.2%). Molar teeth had the highest frequency of errors, and mesio-buccal roots of maxillary molars showed the highest percentage of errors. The AAE developed asignificantly useful tool to determine the difficulty of each case treated in undergraduate clinics, and following their recommendations will minimize the risk of iatrogenic errors.
评估病例困难的价值及其对牙髓医源性错误的影响:一项回顾性横断面研究
美国牙髓医师协会(AAE)发布了一份病例难度评估表,以帮助普通牙医和学生在他们的专业范围内治疗病例或转诊晚期病例,以减少医源性错误的风险。本研究的目的是确定病例难度评估表使用后医源性并发症的发生率。随机选取2016-2017学年在本科门诊接受根管治疗的1000例患者。在治疗开始前对每个病例进行病例难度评估。一旦病例被批准在本科诊所进行治疗,就按照阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学牙科学院牙髓科的标准程序进行牙髓治疗。在常规根管治疗中获取数字x线片,并由4名观察员评估是否存在医源性错误,然后对数据进行统计分析。医源性错误与病例困难有显著相关(p= 0.003),在本科门诊就诊的所有牙齿中,医源性错误检出率为22.1%。未充填占检测到的错误的最高百分比(8.4%),其次是边缘形成(4.2%)。磨牙错误率最高,上颌磨牙中颊根错误率最高。AAE开发了一种非常有用的工具来确定在本科诊所治疗的每个病例的难度,并遵循他们的建议将医源性错误的风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信