Flight Management System Pathfinding Algorithm for Automatic Vertical Trajectory Generation

Ramon Andreu Altava, Jean-Claude Méré, D. Delahaye, T. Miquel
{"title":"Flight Management System Pathfinding Algorithm for Automatic Vertical Trajectory Generation","authors":"Ramon Andreu Altava, Jean-Claude Méré, D. Delahaye, T. Miquel","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Air Traffic has evolved over the years with current commercial fleet expected to double in the near future, increasing airspace congestion. Jet fuel prices volatility, market competition and drones integrating the same airspace require a modernization of the Air Transportation System. In this context, Airbus proposes modern avionics and cockpit designs to fulfil these requirements. Flight Management System (FMS), in-service since the early 1980s, is one of these candidate avionic systems to be revisited. During high workload flight phases as descent and approach are, best-in-class FMSs compute a fixed vertical reference trajectory based on a lateral flight plan and applicable procedures. Then, flight guidance is responsible for tactical replanning so that deviations are absorbed. FMS reference profile is constructed through a series of hypotheses, which could be enhanced by taking into account other factors such as aircraft optimal energy repartition, ATC restrictions, surrounding traffic, wind errors and mass biases. This paper proposes and compares two methodologies based on a modified version of A* algorithm that solves the Optimal Control Problem in the vertical plane. Fixed and variable speed aircraft trajectories are compared in order to quantify the benefits with respect to current FMS design. The problem is formulated through a relaxed point-mass model with a real performance database for a modern commercial aircraft. It accounts for flight constraints as well as aircraft dynamics for trajectory generation. Fuel consumption is optimized without excessively penalizing flight time. These trajectories are compared with those generated by Airbus FMS simulator. Results show that, for modern arrival procedures such as those defined for Continuous Descent Operations, aircraft energy management (potential and kinetic) is enhanced, producing continuously idle trajectories that consume up to 30 % less fuel than current operations, as obtained for this particular procedure. In that case, flight time would be stretched by few minutes yielding to 15% extra time, whose trade-off still seems interesting from the airline perspective.","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Air Traffic has evolved over the years with current commercial fleet expected to double in the near future, increasing airspace congestion. Jet fuel prices volatility, market competition and drones integrating the same airspace require a modernization of the Air Transportation System. In this context, Airbus proposes modern avionics and cockpit designs to fulfil these requirements. Flight Management System (FMS), in-service since the early 1980s, is one of these candidate avionic systems to be revisited. During high workload flight phases as descent and approach are, best-in-class FMSs compute a fixed vertical reference trajectory based on a lateral flight plan and applicable procedures. Then, flight guidance is responsible for tactical replanning so that deviations are absorbed. FMS reference profile is constructed through a series of hypotheses, which could be enhanced by taking into account other factors such as aircraft optimal energy repartition, ATC restrictions, surrounding traffic, wind errors and mass biases. This paper proposes and compares two methodologies based on a modified version of A* algorithm that solves the Optimal Control Problem in the vertical plane. Fixed and variable speed aircraft trajectories are compared in order to quantify the benefits with respect to current FMS design. The problem is formulated through a relaxed point-mass model with a real performance database for a modern commercial aircraft. It accounts for flight constraints as well as aircraft dynamics for trajectory generation. Fuel consumption is optimized without excessively penalizing flight time. These trajectories are compared with those generated by Airbus FMS simulator. Results show that, for modern arrival procedures such as those defined for Continuous Descent Operations, aircraft energy management (potential and kinetic) is enhanced, producing continuously idle trajectories that consume up to 30 % less fuel than current operations, as obtained for this particular procedure. In that case, flight time would be stretched by few minutes yielding to 15% extra time, whose trade-off still seems interesting from the airline perspective.
飞行管理系统自动垂直轨迹生成寻径算法
空中交通多年来一直在发展,目前的商业机队预计在不久的将来会翻一番,这加剧了空域的拥堵。航空燃料价格波动、市场竞争以及整合同一空域的无人机需要航空运输系统的现代化。在这种情况下,空客提出了现代航空电子设备和驾驶舱设计来满足这些要求。飞行管理系统(FMS),自20世纪80年代初服役以来,是这些候选航空电子系统之一,需要重新审视。在像下降和进近这样的高负荷飞行阶段,一流的fms基于横向飞行计划和适用程序计算固定的垂直参考轨迹。然后,飞行制导负责战术重新规划,以便吸收偏差。FMS参考剖面是通过一系列假设构建的,并可以通过考虑飞机最优能量再分配、空中交通管制限制、周围交通、风误差和质量偏差等其他因素来增强参考剖面。本文在改进的a *算法的基础上,提出并比较了两种解决垂直平面上最优控制问题的方法。为了量化相对于当前FMS设计的好处,对固定和变速飞机轨迹进行了比较。该问题是通过一个具有现代商用飞机实际性能数据库的松弛点质量模型来表述的。它考虑了飞行约束以及轨迹生成的飞机动力学。燃油消耗是优化的,而不会过度惩罚飞行时间。将这些轨迹与空客FMS模拟器生成的轨迹进行了比较。结果表明,对于现代到达程序,例如为连续下降操作定义的程序,飞机能量管理(势能和动能)得到了增强,产生连续空闲轨迹,比当前操作消耗的燃料少30%。在这种情况下,飞行时间将被延长几分钟,从而产生15%的额外时间,从航空公司的角度来看,这种权衡仍然很有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信