The Old Believers of Simbirsk and Samara in the Second Half of the 19th – Beginning of the 20th Century (according to the Materials of the Samara and Simbirian Diarish Departments)

Alexey N. Rukhlin
{"title":"The Old Believers of Simbirsk and Samara in the Second Half of the 19th – Beginning of the 20th Century (according to the Materials of the Samara and Simbirian Diarish Departments)","authors":"Alexey N. Rukhlin","doi":"10.15507/2078-9823.061.023.202301.020-032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n\nIntroduction. The presented article describes the Old Believer movement in the Simbirsk-Samara Volga region through the periodical press of this region. The chronological framework of the work covers the middle of the 19th – the beginning of the 20th century. The presented material touches on one of the dramatic problems of Russian history, the church schism and the emergence of the Old Believers movement. The relevance of the presented material lies in the growing interest of the Russian society in this topic, and especially among Orthodox youth. The problem of splits and divisions in Russian society is not a new phenomenon in our country. The reform, which began as a political adventure of Patriarch Nikon, led to a split of Orthodox Christians into Old Believers and Nikonians. The Old Believers have experienced a lot and in spite of everything they have preserved that ancient spiritual heritage, in which the spirit of Holy Russia has been preserved. The purpose of the article is to define, on the basis of newspaper materials, the role of the Old Believers in Russia, its uniqueness for the further history of the country.\n\nMaterials and Methods. The main sources are periodicals. The work is based on the principles of historicism to the study of the past. The research methodology is based on special-historical general historical methods – scientific description.\n\nResearch Results. As a result of the study, the author introduces into scientific circulation historical facts from diocesan records that have not previously been presented in modern historical science. Having a monopoly position in the state and society, the official church in its diocesan publications openly criticized all Old Believer trends (except for co-religionists). The anti-schismatic tone in publications has not changed throughout the existence of diocesan journals. At the beginning of the 20th century, the authorities and the church made significant compromises with regard to the Old Believers, but in the press, they remained the same sectarians who must be joined to the “true faith”.\n\nDiscussion and Conclusion. The fight against the “schism” in Russia has always occupied a huge place in the life of the Russian Orthodox Church. The official church tried by all means to join the schismatics. The Old Believers, in conditions of severe persecution, actively continued to defend the principles of their faith, traditions and way of life. After the First Russian Revolution, there were hopes for the legal existence of the Old Believer Church. The February revolution completely gave the Old Believers freedom, but new persecutions began under the Bolsheviks. Relations between the New Believers and supporters of the “old times” change in the Soviet era, when both denominations existed under the yoke of the Soviets. Formal reconciliation did not lead to the restoration of both churches, the “historical schism” turned out to be deeper and harder. It can be concluded that this topic is still relevant today. The proposed provisions and conclusions create prerequisites for further study of this problem.","PeriodicalId":406854,"journal":{"name":"Humanitarian: actual problems of the humanities and education","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanitarian: actual problems of the humanities and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2078-9823.061.023.202301.020-032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. The presented article describes the Old Believer movement in the Simbirsk-Samara Volga region through the periodical press of this region. The chronological framework of the work covers the middle of the 19th – the beginning of the 20th century. The presented material touches on one of the dramatic problems of Russian history, the church schism and the emergence of the Old Believers movement. The relevance of the presented material lies in the growing interest of the Russian society in this topic, and especially among Orthodox youth. The problem of splits and divisions in Russian society is not a new phenomenon in our country. The reform, which began as a political adventure of Patriarch Nikon, led to a split of Orthodox Christians into Old Believers and Nikonians. The Old Believers have experienced a lot and in spite of everything they have preserved that ancient spiritual heritage, in which the spirit of Holy Russia has been preserved. The purpose of the article is to define, on the basis of newspaper materials, the role of the Old Believers in Russia, its uniqueness for the further history of the country. Materials and Methods. The main sources are periodicals. The work is based on the principles of historicism to the study of the past. The research methodology is based on special-historical general historical methods – scientific description. Research Results. As a result of the study, the author introduces into scientific circulation historical facts from diocesan records that have not previously been presented in modern historical science. Having a monopoly position in the state and society, the official church in its diocesan publications openly criticized all Old Believer trends (except for co-religionists). The anti-schismatic tone in publications has not changed throughout the existence of diocesan journals. At the beginning of the 20th century, the authorities and the church made significant compromises with regard to the Old Believers, but in the press, they remained the same sectarians who must be joined to the “true faith”. Discussion and Conclusion. The fight against the “schism” in Russia has always occupied a huge place in the life of the Russian Orthodox Church. The official church tried by all means to join the schismatics. The Old Believers, in conditions of severe persecution, actively continued to defend the principles of their faith, traditions and way of life. After the First Russian Revolution, there were hopes for the legal existence of the Old Believer Church. The February revolution completely gave the Old Believers freedom, but new persecutions began under the Bolsheviks. Relations between the New Believers and supporters of the “old times” change in the Soviet era, when both denominations existed under the yoke of the Soviets. Formal reconciliation did not lead to the restoration of both churches, the “historical schism” turned out to be deeper and harder. It can be concluded that this topic is still relevant today. The proposed provisions and conclusions create prerequisites for further study of this problem.
19世纪下半叶- 20世纪初辛比尔斯克和萨马拉的老信徒(根据萨马拉和辛比尔安日记部的资料)
AbstractIntroduction。本文通过辛比尔斯克-萨马拉伏尔加河地区的期刊,描述了该地区的老信徒运动。作品的时间框架涵盖了19世纪中期至20世纪初。所呈现的材料涉及俄罗斯历史上的一个戏剧性问题,即教会分裂和旧信徒运动的出现。所呈现材料的相关性在于俄罗斯社会对这一主题的兴趣日益浓厚,特别是在东正教青年中。俄罗斯社会的分裂和分裂问题在我国并不是一个新现象。这一改革始于大牧首尼康的政治冒险,导致东正教徒分裂为老信徒和尼康派。老信徒们经历了很多,尽管经历了一切,但他们保留了古老的精神遗产,其中保留了神圣俄罗斯的精神。本文的目的是在报纸资料的基础上,定义俄罗斯旧信徒的作用,其独特性对国家的进一步历史。材料与方法。主要来源是期刊。这项工作是根据历史主义的原则来研究过去的。研究方法以特殊历史的一般历史方法——科学描述为基础。研究的结果。作为研究的结果,作者从教区记录中引入了科学流通的历史事实,这些事实以前没有在现代历史科学中出现过。由于在国家和社会中处于垄断地位,官方教会在其教区出版物中公开批评所有旧信徒派(除了同教者)。在整个教区期刊的存在中,出版物的反分裂基调并没有改变。在20世纪初,当局和教会对旧信徒作出了重大妥协,但在新闻界,他们仍然是必须加入“真正的信仰”的教派主义者。讨论与结论。在俄罗斯,反对“分裂”的斗争一直在俄罗斯东正教会的生活中占据着巨大的地位。官方教会想尽一切办法加入分裂派。旧信徒在受到严重迫害的情况下,积极地继续捍卫他们的信仰、传统和生活方式的原则。在第一次俄国革命之后,旧信徒教会有了合法存在的希望。二月革命完全给了旧信徒自由,但布尔什维克领导下的新迫害开始了。新信徒和“旧时代”的支持者之间的关系在苏联时代发生了变化,当时两个教派都在苏联人的枷锁下存在。正式的和解并没有导致两个教会的恢复,“历史分裂”变得更加深刻和困难。可以得出结论,这个话题今天仍然有意义。拟议的条款和结论为进一步研究这一问题创造了先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信