Breaking the Golden Handcuffs: Recreating Markets for Tenured Faculty

M. Alam
{"title":"Breaking the Golden Handcuffs: Recreating Markets for Tenured Faculty","authors":"M. Alam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3465248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present system of tenure in American colleges – combined with a dramatic rise in the proportion of non-tenure-track faculty – has led to a near-closure of active markets for most tenured faculty. In turn, this produces two types of mismatches: some departments/colleges have faculty they do not want; and some faculty would much prefer to relocate to another department/college. These mismatches are not without costs for professors and departments/colleges. Without abolishing or diluting tenure, colleges can alleviate these inefficiencies by initiating reforms to recreate markets for tenured faculty. This can be accomplished by establishing computerized job ex-changes that allow departments/colleges to engage in mutually beneficial trades – within and across disciplines and across colleges – of tenured professors who are currently mismatched.","PeriodicalId":398942,"journal":{"name":"Social Sciences eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Sciences eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3465248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present system of tenure in American colleges – combined with a dramatic rise in the proportion of non-tenure-track faculty – has led to a near-closure of active markets for most tenured faculty. In turn, this produces two types of mismatches: some departments/colleges have faculty they do not want; and some faculty would much prefer to relocate to another department/college. These mismatches are not without costs for professors and departments/colleges. Without abolishing or diluting tenure, colleges can alleviate these inefficiencies by initiating reforms to recreate markets for tenured faculty. This can be accomplished by establishing computerized job ex-changes that allow departments/colleges to engage in mutually beneficial trades – within and across disciplines and across colleges – of tenured professors who are currently mismatched.
打破金手铐:为终身教授重新创造市场
美国大学目前的终身教职制度,加上非终身教职教师比例的急剧上升,导致大多数终身教职教师的活跃市场几乎关闭。这反过来又产生了两种类型的不匹配:一些院系/学院有他们不想要的教员;一些教师更愿意搬到另一个部门/学院。这些不匹配对教授和院系/学院来说不是没有代价的。在不废除或稀释终身教职的情况下,大学可以通过启动改革来重塑终身教职的市场,从而缓解这些效率低下的问题。这可以通过建立计算机化的工作交换来实现,这使得院系/学院能够在学科内部、跨学科和跨学院之间,对目前不匹配的终身教授进行互惠互利的交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信