Chat Response Competency: Library Professionals vs. Undergraduate Student Employees

Michael Whitchurch, E. Merrill
{"title":"Chat Response Competency: Library Professionals vs. Undergraduate Student Employees","authors":"Michael Whitchurch, E. Merrill","doi":"10.15640/jlis.v7n2a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on the qualitative analysis of 4,475 chat transcripts from the 2016 calendar year for the specific purpose of comparing accuracy and completeness between student employees and non-student employees. Using research done at other institutions as a guide, researchers developed a coding rubric, then coded and analyzed the transcripts. The researchers reviewed each transcript three times; once by a student employee, once by a paraprofessional and once by a faculty librarian. Researchers discovered that while non-student employees are slightly better at providing accurate and complete chat answers, the student employees are better at understanding and using the technology like their peers, who are the majority of the patrons who use chat. More importantly, this research confirms and builds on former research to show that having student employees as the primary contact for answering chat questions is not only as effective as non-student employees answering chat, but the potential cost savings, relative to time and salary, are significant.","PeriodicalId":142897,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCES","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15640/jlis.v7n2a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports on the qualitative analysis of 4,475 chat transcripts from the 2016 calendar year for the specific purpose of comparing accuracy and completeness between student employees and non-student employees. Using research done at other institutions as a guide, researchers developed a coding rubric, then coded and analyzed the transcripts. The researchers reviewed each transcript three times; once by a student employee, once by a paraprofessional and once by a faculty librarian. Researchers discovered that while non-student employees are slightly better at providing accurate and complete chat answers, the student employees are better at understanding and using the technology like their peers, who are the majority of the patrons who use chat. More importantly, this research confirms and builds on former research to show that having student employees as the primary contact for answering chat questions is not only as effective as non-student employees answering chat, but the potential cost savings, relative to time and salary, are significant.
聊天回应能力:图书馆专业人员与大学生雇员
本文对2016日历年的4475份聊天记录进行了定性分析,具体目的是比较学生员工和非学生员工的准确性和完整性。研究人员以其他机构的研究为指导,制定了一个编码准则,然后对转录本进行编码和分析。研究人员对每个记录进行了三次审查;一次是学生雇员,一次是辅助专业人员,还有一次是教员图书管理员。研究人员发现,虽然非学生员工在提供准确和完整的聊天答案方面稍好一些,但学生员工在理解和使用技术方面更像他们的同龄人,他们是使用聊天的大多数顾客。更重要的是,这项研究证实并建立在以前的研究基础上,表明让学生员工作为回答聊天问题的主要联系人不仅与非学生员工回答聊天问题一样有效,而且相对于时间和工资而言,潜在的成本节约是显著的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信