{"title":"Muslim Philanthropy for Public Interest: Lessons from Zakat Management in MMCs","authors":"S. Hasan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3653317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Islamic concept of economic relationship, a fundamental belief is that ‘wealth’ is a “bounty” (“gift”) from Allah and must be shared for public interest (al masalaha al mursalah). The instrument for sharing and “increase and purification” of wealth is zakat al-mal. Though called obligatory, zakat al-mal calculation and payment has been responsibility of the owner of wealth, not the ‘collector’. In the recent past some Muslim majority countries (MMCs) have undertaken steps to improve zakat collection for the highest possible public interest benefits. As such, zakat al-mal has been managed variedly in different countries. The question is what have the Muslim majority countries (MMCs) done in refining zakat management to increase its ‘public interest’ benefit? This paper is a study of zakat al-mal management, only collection, for public interest in (26) Muslim majority countries (MMCs) in Asia. The main analyses is divided into six short parts dealing with Zakat Payment and Collection: Principles and Process; Zakat Management Reform: Collection (Mandatory and Formal); Zakat Collection: Method and Expense; Zakat Payment and the Tax System; Zakat and Ushr: On Agriculture Produce; Informal Zakat Management: Advantages and Disadvantages. It highlights features, issues, and replicable lessons of the zakat al-mal management systems in the MMCs in Asia reformed to achieve higher public interest. MMCs in Asia with professional zakat collection system have followed different approaches of zakat collection creating better opportunity for maximizing public interest benefit of Muslim philanthropy. Nonetheless, many MMC governments have been reluctant in reforming philanthropy management. The essay argues that there needs to be a system of communication, to create public awareness highlighting the public interest benefits of an improved zakat collection system. In the internet era many Muslim orators are spreading imaginary or irrational ‘judgments’ on economic and social matters in many countries, the governments need to use the same platform with the help of accredited Islamic scholars to improve zakat management for public interest (al masalaha al mursalah). The essay is based on a thorough survey of the constitutions, laws, government regulations, academic publications, field research and consultations by the author in a dozen countries, and the author’s personal communications about and observation of philanthropic activities in the 26 MMCs in Asia.","PeriodicalId":409245,"journal":{"name":"NGO & Non-Profit Organizations eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NGO & Non-Profit Organizations eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3653317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In the Islamic concept of economic relationship, a fundamental belief is that ‘wealth’ is a “bounty” (“gift”) from Allah and must be shared for public interest (al masalaha al mursalah). The instrument for sharing and “increase and purification” of wealth is zakat al-mal. Though called obligatory, zakat al-mal calculation and payment has been responsibility of the owner of wealth, not the ‘collector’. In the recent past some Muslim majority countries (MMCs) have undertaken steps to improve zakat collection for the highest possible public interest benefits. As such, zakat al-mal has been managed variedly in different countries. The question is what have the Muslim majority countries (MMCs) done in refining zakat management to increase its ‘public interest’ benefit? This paper is a study of zakat al-mal management, only collection, for public interest in (26) Muslim majority countries (MMCs) in Asia. The main analyses is divided into six short parts dealing with Zakat Payment and Collection: Principles and Process; Zakat Management Reform: Collection (Mandatory and Formal); Zakat Collection: Method and Expense; Zakat Payment and the Tax System; Zakat and Ushr: On Agriculture Produce; Informal Zakat Management: Advantages and Disadvantages. It highlights features, issues, and replicable lessons of the zakat al-mal management systems in the MMCs in Asia reformed to achieve higher public interest. MMCs in Asia with professional zakat collection system have followed different approaches of zakat collection creating better opportunity for maximizing public interest benefit of Muslim philanthropy. Nonetheless, many MMC governments have been reluctant in reforming philanthropy management. The essay argues that there needs to be a system of communication, to create public awareness highlighting the public interest benefits of an improved zakat collection system. In the internet era many Muslim orators are spreading imaginary or irrational ‘judgments’ on economic and social matters in many countries, the governments need to use the same platform with the help of accredited Islamic scholars to improve zakat management for public interest (al masalaha al mursalah). The essay is based on a thorough survey of the constitutions, laws, government regulations, academic publications, field research and consultations by the author in a dozen countries, and the author’s personal communications about and observation of philanthropic activities in the 26 MMCs in Asia.
在伊斯兰的经济关系概念中,一个基本的信念是“财富”是真主的“赏金”(“礼物”),必须为了公共利益而分享(al masalaha al mursalah)。分享和“增加和净化”财富的工具是天课。虽然被称为义务,天课的计算和支付一直是财富所有者的责任,而不是“收藏家”的责任。在最近的过去,一些穆斯林占多数的国家(MMCs)已经采取措施改善天课的收集,以获得尽可能高的公共利益。因此,天课在不同的国家有不同的管理方式。问题是,穆斯林占多数的国家(MMCs)在完善天课管理以增加其“公共利益”方面做了什么?本文研究了亚洲(26个)穆斯林占多数的国家(MMCs)为公共利益而进行的天课管理(仅收集)。主要的分析分为六个简短的部分来处理天课的支付和收取:原则和过程;天课管理改革:征收(强制性和正式)天课收藏:方法与费用天课支付和税收制度;天课与乌日课:论农业生产非正式天课管理:利弊。报告重点介绍了为提高公众利益而改革的亚洲mmc的天课管理制度的特点、问题和可复制的经验教训。拥有专业天课募集体系的亚洲伊斯兰教慈善机构采取了不同的天课募集方式,为穆斯林慈善事业的公共利益最大化创造了更好的机会。然而,许多MMC政府一直不愿改革慈善管理。这篇文章认为,需要有一个沟通系统,以建立公众意识,突出改进的天课收集系统的公共利益。在互联网时代,许多穆斯林演说家在许多国家传播对经济和社会事务的虚构或非理性的“判断”,政府需要在认可的伊斯兰学者的帮助下使用相同的平台来改善公共利益的天课管理(al masalaha al mursalah)。本文基于笔者对亚洲26家mmc的宪法、法律、政府法规、学术出版物、实地调研和咨询等十几个国家的深入调查,以及笔者对其慈善活动的个人交流和观察。