Providing evidence for a philosophical claim: The Act of Killing and the banality of evil

Thomas E. Wartenberg
{"title":"Providing evidence for a philosophical claim: The Act of Killing and the banality of evil","authors":"Thomas E. Wartenberg","doi":"10.25969/MEDIAREP/3401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been an ongoing debate among philosophers and film theorists about whether films are capable of doing philosophy. The vast majority of the contributions to this debate have concentrated on narrative fiction films and the extent to which they are capable of producing something recognisable as philosophy.[2] This essay begins to correct this imbalance by arguing that a documentary can do philosophy. Documentaries are an important, thriving genre of contemporary filmmaking, so the failure to consider the possibility of their making a philosophical contribution is a serious lacuna in the debate about cinematic philosophy.","PeriodicalId":174743,"journal":{"name":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","volume":"46 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25969/MEDIAREP/3401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There has been an ongoing debate among philosophers and film theorists about whether films are capable of doing philosophy. The vast majority of the contributions to this debate have concentrated on narrative fiction films and the extent to which they are capable of producing something recognisable as philosophy.[2] This essay begins to correct this imbalance by arguing that a documentary can do philosophy. Documentaries are an important, thriving genre of contemporary filmmaking, so the failure to consider the possibility of their making a philosophical contribution is a serious lacuna in the debate about cinematic philosophy.
为一个哲学命题提供证据:《杀戮行为》和邪恶的平庸
哲学家和电影理论家一直在争论电影是否有能力做哲学。对这场辩论的绝大多数贡献都集中在叙事小说电影上,以及它们在多大程度上能够产生可识别为哲学的东西。[2]本文通过论证纪录片可以做哲学来纠正这种不平衡。纪录片是当代电影制作中一个重要的、蓬勃发展的类型,因此没有考虑到它们做出哲学贡献的可能性是关于电影哲学辩论的一个严重空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信