{"title":"On the deficit of binary logic. A metabletic exploration of science, economy and politics","authors":"W. Allaerts","doi":"10.57028/c56-025-z1038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Billions of people have grown up with clear notions of right and wrong, fair and simple, and yet the world is divided into irreconcilable camps, more than it ever was. What is the nature of this polarizing mechanism? In the present paper, we leave the essential dichotomization as expressed in the binary number system, as well as its transformation in computing theory, and dwell on the historic backgrounds and analogies of the notion of polarization in science, economy and the world of finance. The theory of ‘metabletics’ of J. H. van den Berg (1914-2012) was found helpful as a metaheuristic approach for reading divergent lines in historical sources. For, historiography in itself appears a much contaminated or fertile ground for ideological polarization. Ideological influencing of the masses is much older than the Internet, but may have reached an unprecedented degree to date, also thanks to the algorithmic construction of social networks. The rationale of this paper follows the illuminating torch of cracks into the world’s all-encompassing constructions, its economy, politics and make-believe-systems. A special moment is also reserved for the role of Fine Arts in this enlightening experience, seen from a philosophical-rather-than-aesthetical viewpoint.","PeriodicalId":254504,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Cognition","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57028/c56-025-z1038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Billions of people have grown up with clear notions of right and wrong, fair and simple, and yet the world is divided into irreconcilable camps, more than it ever was. What is the nature of this polarizing mechanism? In the present paper, we leave the essential dichotomization as expressed in the binary number system, as well as its transformation in computing theory, and dwell on the historic backgrounds and analogies of the notion of polarization in science, economy and the world of finance. The theory of ‘metabletics’ of J. H. van den Berg (1914-2012) was found helpful as a metaheuristic approach for reading divergent lines in historical sources. For, historiography in itself appears a much contaminated or fertile ground for ideological polarization. Ideological influencing of the masses is much older than the Internet, but may have reached an unprecedented degree to date, also thanks to the algorithmic construction of social networks. The rationale of this paper follows the illuminating torch of cracks into the world’s all-encompassing constructions, its economy, politics and make-believe-systems. A special moment is also reserved for the role of Fine Arts in this enlightening experience, seen from a philosophical-rather-than-aesthetical viewpoint.
数十亿人在对与错、公平与简单的清晰观念中长大,然而世界却比以往任何时候都分裂成不可调和的阵营。这种极化机制的本质是什么?在本文中,我们离开了二进制数系统中所表达的基本二分法,以及它在计算理论中的转化,并详述了科学、经济和金融领域中两极分化概念的历史背景和类比。j.h. van den Berg(1914-2012)的“metabletics”理论被认为是一种有助于阅读历史资料中不同线条的元启发式方法。因为,史学本身似乎是意识形态两极分化的污染或肥沃的土壤。大众意识形态的影响比互联网要古老得多,但迄今为止可能已经达到了前所未有的程度,这也得益于社交网络的算法构建。本文的基本原理是遵循世界上无所不包的结构、经济、政治和虚假体系的裂缝的照明火炬。从哲学而非美学的角度来看,美术在这一启蒙经验中的作用也被保留了一个特殊的时刻。