On the deficit of binary logic. A metabletic exploration of science, economy and politics

W. Allaerts
{"title":"On the deficit of binary logic. A metabletic exploration of science, economy and politics","authors":"W. Allaerts","doi":"10.57028/c56-025-z1038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Billions of people have grown up with clear notions of right and wrong, fair and simple, and yet the world is divided into irreconcilable camps, more than it ever was. What is the nature of this polarizing mechanism? In the present paper, we leave the essential dichotomization as expressed in the binary number system, as well as its transformation in computing theory, and dwell on the historic backgrounds and analogies of the notion of polarization in science, economy and the world of finance. The theory of ‘metabletics’ of J. H. van den Berg (1914-2012) was found helpful as a metaheuristic approach for reading divergent lines in historical sources. For, historiography in itself appears a much contaminated or fertile ground for ideological polarization. Ideological influencing of the masses is much older than the Internet, but may have reached an unprecedented degree to date, also thanks to the algorithmic construction of social networks. The rationale of this paper follows the illuminating torch of cracks into the world’s all-encompassing constructions, its economy, politics and make-believe-systems. A special moment is also reserved for the role of Fine Arts in this enlightening experience, seen from a philosophical-rather-than-aesthetical viewpoint.","PeriodicalId":254504,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Cognition","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57028/c56-025-z1038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Billions of people have grown up with clear notions of right and wrong, fair and simple, and yet the world is divided into irreconcilable camps, more than it ever was. What is the nature of this polarizing mechanism? In the present paper, we leave the essential dichotomization as expressed in the binary number system, as well as its transformation in computing theory, and dwell on the historic backgrounds and analogies of the notion of polarization in science, economy and the world of finance. The theory of ‘metabletics’ of J. H. van den Berg (1914-2012) was found helpful as a metaheuristic approach for reading divergent lines in historical sources. For, historiography in itself appears a much contaminated or fertile ground for ideological polarization. Ideological influencing of the masses is much older than the Internet, but may have reached an unprecedented degree to date, also thanks to the algorithmic construction of social networks. The rationale of this paper follows the illuminating torch of cracks into the world’s all-encompassing constructions, its economy, politics and make-believe-systems. A special moment is also reserved for the role of Fine Arts in this enlightening experience, seen from a philosophical-rather-than-aesthetical viewpoint.
论二元逻辑的缺陷。科学、经济和政治的综合探索
数十亿人在对与错、公平与简单的清晰观念中长大,然而世界却比以往任何时候都分裂成不可调和的阵营。这种极化机制的本质是什么?在本文中,我们离开了二进制数系统中所表达的基本二分法,以及它在计算理论中的转化,并详述了科学、经济和金融领域中两极分化概念的历史背景和类比。j.h. van den Berg(1914-2012)的“metabletics”理论被认为是一种有助于阅读历史资料中不同线条的元启发式方法。因为,史学本身似乎是意识形态两极分化的污染或肥沃的土壤。大众意识形态的影响比互联网要古老得多,但迄今为止可能已经达到了前所未有的程度,这也得益于社交网络的算法构建。本文的基本原理是遵循世界上无所不包的结构、经济、政治和虚假体系的裂缝的照明火炬。从哲学而非美学的角度来看,美术在这一启蒙经验中的作用也被保留了一个特殊的时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信