“It’s Not like This Back Home” Conversations and Conversation Analysis as a Tool to Consider the Family Medicine Consultation in India

K. Mohanna
{"title":"“It’s Not like This Back Home” Conversations and Conversation Analysis as a Tool to Consider the Family Medicine Consultation in India","authors":"K. Mohanna","doi":"10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This paper describes some of the features of family medicine consultations in one clinic in India. In the United Kingdom (UK) there is a significant difference in the success rate in the Royal College of General Practice postgraduate licensing assessment (MRCGP) between those doctors who graduated MBBS from overseas but who trained and work in the UK, and those who graduated in the UK. The reasons for this are not known, but are likely to be multifactorial. India is the country of origin of one of the largest groups of UK International Medical Graduates (IMGs) and some doctors from India feel that their difficulty in passing this exam is in part due to family medicine being performed differently in India. \nMethods: The reported experiences of family medicine trained doctors in India about contextual aspects of practice are explored through a thematic analysis of focus group and interviews. A conversation analysis of work done by talk-in-interaction in video recordings of actual family medicine consultations in India is also presented.\nResults and Discussion: The impact of family medicine training, or the lack of it, and Indian structural and societal norms in the practice of family medicine are considered. The Clinical Skills Assessment element of MRCGP (CSA) heavily emphasises talk as used in all three assessment domains - data gathering, clinical management and interpersonal skills. The phrase ‘interactional fluidity’ is coined for the marker of competence with talk that RCGP examiners seek. This has implications in a high-stakes, yet simulated, assessment for those consulting in a second language. Using a model that differentiates between ‘core business work talk’, ‘work-related talk’ and ‘small talk’, the talk from video-recorded real-life consultations in India will be analysed. The risk of UK examiners mistaking unfamiliar patterns of talk for lack of medical competence is discussed. \nConclusion: The differential attainment of IMGs has been described for some time and this paper aims to move the discussion on to potential training interventions in response.","PeriodicalId":140679,"journal":{"name":"Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This paper describes some of the features of family medicine consultations in one clinic in India. In the United Kingdom (UK) there is a significant difference in the success rate in the Royal College of General Practice postgraduate licensing assessment (MRCGP) between those doctors who graduated MBBS from overseas but who trained and work in the UK, and those who graduated in the UK. The reasons for this are not known, but are likely to be multifactorial. India is the country of origin of one of the largest groups of UK International Medical Graduates (IMGs) and some doctors from India feel that their difficulty in passing this exam is in part due to family medicine being performed differently in India. Methods: The reported experiences of family medicine trained doctors in India about contextual aspects of practice are explored through a thematic analysis of focus group and interviews. A conversation analysis of work done by talk-in-interaction in video recordings of actual family medicine consultations in India is also presented. Results and Discussion: The impact of family medicine training, or the lack of it, and Indian structural and societal norms in the practice of family medicine are considered. The Clinical Skills Assessment element of MRCGP (CSA) heavily emphasises talk as used in all three assessment domains - data gathering, clinical management and interpersonal skills. The phrase ‘interactional fluidity’ is coined for the marker of competence with talk that RCGP examiners seek. This has implications in a high-stakes, yet simulated, assessment for those consulting in a second language. Using a model that differentiates between ‘core business work talk’, ‘work-related talk’ and ‘small talk’, the talk from video-recorded real-life consultations in India will be analysed. The risk of UK examiners mistaking unfamiliar patterns of talk for lack of medical competence is discussed. Conclusion: The differential attainment of IMGs has been described for some time and this paper aims to move the discussion on to potential training interventions in response.
“在家里不是这样的”谈话和谈话分析作为一种工具来考虑印度的家庭医学咨询
简介:本文描述了一些特点的家庭医学咨询在一个诊所在印度。在英国,那些从海外毕业但在英国培训和工作的MBBS医生和那些在英国毕业的医生在皇家全科医学院研究生执照评估(MRCGP)的成功率有显著差异。其原因尚不清楚,但可能是多方面的。印度是英国国际医学毕业生(img)最大群体之一的原籍国,一些来自印度的医生认为,他们之所以难以通过这项考试,部分原因是印度的家庭医学实施方式不同。方法:通过焦点小组和访谈的专题分析,探讨印度家庭医学培训医生关于实践背景方面的报告经验。对话分析工作所做的谈话在互动录像的实际家庭医学咨询在印度也提出了。结果和讨论:考虑了家庭医学培训的影响,或缺乏培训,以及印度家庭医学实践中的结构和社会规范。MRCGP (CSA)的临床技能评估元素在所有三个评估领域(数据收集、临床管理和人际交往能力)中都非常强调谈话。短语“互动流动性”是为RCGP审查员寻求的谈话能力的标记而创造的。这对那些用第二语言进行咨询的人来说,是一种高风险的模拟评估。使用一个区分“核心业务工作谈话”、“与工作有关的谈话”和“闲聊”的模型,将分析来自印度真实咨询视频的谈话。讨论了英国审查员将不熟悉的谈话模式误认为缺乏医疗能力的风险。结论:IMGs的差异成就已经被描述了一段时间,本文的目的是将讨论转移到潜在的培训干预措施上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信