TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO NO APOIO À SEGUNDA OPINIÃO FORMATIVA EM SAÚDE PÚBLICA

M. Lustosa, Gisele Raptopoulos, Cibelle Quaglio, R. Ferraz, L. J. Motta
{"title":"TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMAÇÃO NO APOIO À SEGUNDA OPINIÃO FORMATIVA EM SAÚDE PÚBLICA","authors":"M. Lustosa, Gisele Raptopoulos, Cibelle Quaglio, R. Ferraz, L. J. Motta","doi":"10.17267/2238-2720REVBAHIANAODONTO.V5I2.589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of health information technology helped the advance in health practices. The second formative opinion understands the actions covering a professional expert remotely with the use of computer resources and telecommunications to another professional. The expert transmits information and knowledge so the applicant is directed to the clinical decision making. The objective of this paper is to analyze the scientific production on “second opinion formation in health” in Brazilian literature, following a bibliometric analysis to answer the question: Studies on information technology in supporting the second formative opinion on public health and are being presented? Were analyzed 61 articles from 2007 to 2014.It can be observed that the number of publications over the period analyzed was growing. It is recommended that future studies deepen the analysis and discussion of the quality and supply of the information provided in the second opinion, since this contributes to the decentralization of care and greater access to health further afield.","PeriodicalId":130717,"journal":{"name":"Revista Bahiana de Odontologia","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Bahiana de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2720REVBAHIANAODONTO.V5I2.589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of health information technology helped the advance in health practices. The second formative opinion understands the actions covering a professional expert remotely with the use of computer resources and telecommunications to another professional. The expert transmits information and knowledge so the applicant is directed to the clinical decision making. The objective of this paper is to analyze the scientific production on “second opinion formation in health” in Brazilian literature, following a bibliometric analysis to answer the question: Studies on information technology in supporting the second formative opinion on public health and are being presented? Were analyzed 61 articles from 2007 to 2014.It can be observed that the number of publications over the period analyzed was growing. It is recommended that future studies deepen the analysis and discussion of the quality and supply of the information provided in the second opinion, since this contributes to the decentralization of care and greater access to health further afield.
支持公共卫生第二形成意见的信息技术
卫生信息技术的使用促进了卫生实践的进步。第二种形成性意见理解涉及一个专业专家远程使用计算机资源和电信到另一个专业的行动。专家传递信息和知识,以便指导申请人进行临床决策。本文的目的是分析巴西文献中关于"卫生领域第二意见形成"的科学成果,通过文献计量学分析来回答以下问题:支持公共卫生领域第二意见形成的信息技术研究正在进行中?对2007 - 2014年的61篇文章进行分析。可以看出,在所分析的期间内,出版物的数量正在增加。建议今后的研究加深对第二份意见所提供资料的质量和供应的分析和讨论,因为这有助于分散护理工作和使更多的地方获得保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信