The evolution of the concept of ART in the English linguistic construal of the world: from CRAFT to CREATIVITY

I. Davydenko, Alevtyna Kalyuzhna, I. Shevchenko
{"title":"The evolution of the concept of ART in the English linguistic construal of the world: from CRAFT to CREATIVITY","authors":"I. Davydenko, Alevtyna Kalyuzhna, I. Shevchenko","doi":"10.26565/2218-2926-2021-23-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many accounts of the concept of ART that generally focus on its synchronous analysis. To date the emergence of a new research approach of historical cognitivе linguistics opens up an opportunity of rethinking the structure of this concept and its place in the English linguistic construal of the world. In this paper, we hypothesize that ART is a gestalt polyappeal concept that evolved by the type of cladogenesis from the concept of CRAFT; accordingly, its place in the English constual of the world changed from UTILITARY to AESTHETIC.With the aim to establish the evolution and place of this concept in the English linguistic construal of the world, the article identifies the means of nominating the concept in terms of diachrony; analyses the semantics of lexical means of concept representation, its structure, and determines vectors of its profiling in different historical periods. The comprehensive method of our research includes identifying the name of the concept, that includes semantic componential and frequency analysis of basic lexemes representing the concept of ART in English. As a result the authors find out the etymological layer of the concept, its etymon and internal form of the name. In this paper, we describe lexical means of representation of the concept of ART, that include such basic lexemes as art, arts, skill, and craft, and claim that the semantic volume of art predominates and includes the semantic volumes of other synonyms. Based on their comparative study, we also claim that the noun art, that dominates both in frequency and in semantic capacity, is the name of the concept of ART. Etymologically, art (n) dates back to the Proto-Indo-European noun *ar (ə) -ti- that meant ‘method of doing smth’, which determines its internal form. The empirical material of this research was obtained from thesauri and etymological dictionaries of English, and from the database BNC. We claim that the conceptual model of ART has undergone historical changes. Being based on PROFESSIONALISM within the segment HUMAN ACTIVITIES in the construal of the world, in the Middle Ages, the concept CRAFTS/ART dominated and was profiled within the domain of UTILITARY. At the beginning of the Renaissance, in the construal of the world, along with CRAFTS (the idea of ​​small-scale production) profiled against the UTILITARY, the concept of WORK (industrial production) was formed; and the concept of ART profiled within the AESTHETIC domain appeared. Today, the concept of ART is the domain for such subdomains as PAINTING, SCULPTURE, LITERATURE, THEATER, DANCE, CINEMA, and others.","PeriodicalId":237005,"journal":{"name":"Cognition, Communication, Discourse","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition, Communication, Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2021-23-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many accounts of the concept of ART that generally focus on its synchronous analysis. To date the emergence of a new research approach of historical cognitivе linguistics opens up an opportunity of rethinking the structure of this concept and its place in the English linguistic construal of the world. In this paper, we hypothesize that ART is a gestalt polyappeal concept that evolved by the type of cladogenesis from the concept of CRAFT; accordingly, its place in the English constual of the world changed from UTILITARY to AESTHETIC.With the aim to establish the evolution and place of this concept in the English linguistic construal of the world, the article identifies the means of nominating the concept in terms of diachrony; analyses the semantics of lexical means of concept representation, its structure, and determines vectors of its profiling in different historical periods. The comprehensive method of our research includes identifying the name of the concept, that includes semantic componential and frequency analysis of basic lexemes representing the concept of ART in English. As a result the authors find out the etymological layer of the concept, its etymon and internal form of the name. In this paper, we describe lexical means of representation of the concept of ART, that include such basic lexemes as art, arts, skill, and craft, and claim that the semantic volume of art predominates and includes the semantic volumes of other synonyms. Based on their comparative study, we also claim that the noun art, that dominates both in frequency and in semantic capacity, is the name of the concept of ART. Etymologically, art (n) dates back to the Proto-Indo-European noun *ar (ə) -ti- that meant ‘method of doing smth’, which determines its internal form. The empirical material of this research was obtained from thesauri and etymological dictionaries of English, and from the database BNC. We claim that the conceptual model of ART has undergone historical changes. Being based on PROFESSIONALISM within the segment HUMAN ACTIVITIES in the construal of the world, in the Middle Ages, the concept CRAFTS/ART dominated and was profiled within the domain of UTILITARY. At the beginning of the Renaissance, in the construal of the world, along with CRAFTS (the idea of ​​small-scale production) profiled against the UTILITARY, the concept of WORK (industrial production) was formed; and the concept of ART profiled within the AESTHETIC domain appeared. Today, the concept of ART is the domain for such subdomains as PAINTING, SCULPTURE, LITERATURE, THEATER, DANCE, CINEMA, and others.
艺术概念在英语世界语言阐释中的演变:从CRAFT到CREATIVITY
有许多关于ART概念的描述通常集中在其同步分析上。迄今为止,历史认知语言学这一新的研究方法的出现为重新思考这一概念的结构及其在英语世界语言解释中的地位提供了机会。本文假设艺术是一种格式塔多诉求概念,由CRAFT概念由枝生类型演化而来;因此,它在世界英语文化中的地位也从功利主义转变为审美主义。为了确立这一概念在英语世界语言解释中的演变和地位,本文从历时性的角度确定了这一概念的命名方式;分析了概念表示的词汇手段的语义及其结构,确定了其在不同历史时期的轮廓向量。本文研究的综合方法包括概念名称识别,即对英语中代表艺术概念的基本词汇进行语义成分分析和频率分析。从而找出了该概念的词源层、词源和名称的内在形态。在本文中,我们描述了艺术概念的词汇表达方式,包括艺术、艺术、技能和工艺等基本词汇,并声称艺术的语义量占主导地位,并包括其他同义词的语义量。在比较研究的基础上,我们还认为名词art在频率和语义容量上都占主导地位,是art概念的名称。从词源上讲,art (n)可以追溯到原始印欧语系的名词*ar (æ) -ti-,意思是“做某事的方法”,这决定了它的内部形式。本研究的实证材料来源于英语同义词典和词源词典,以及数据库BNC。我们认为,ART的概念模式经历了历史性的变化。在中世纪,基于人类活动领域的专业主义,手工艺/艺术的概念在实用性领域占主导地位。文艺复兴之初,在对世界的阐释中,伴随着反对功利主义的CRAFTS(小规模生产的概念),形成了WORK(工业生产)的概念;美学领域内的艺术概念出现了。今天,艺术的概念是绘画、雕塑、文学、戏剧、舞蹈、电影等子领域的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信