Assessment of Program Educational Objectives using Alumni Survey: The UMS experience

J. Makinda, N. Bolong, L. Gungat, A. Sarman
{"title":"Assessment of Program Educational Objectives using Alumni Survey: The UMS experience","authors":"J. Makinda, N. Bolong, L. Gungat, A. Sarman","doi":"10.1109/ICEED.2011.6235351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Outcome Based Education (OBE) is as an educational process which is based on trying to achieve certain specified outcomes in terms of individual student learning. The OBE assessment includes three types of outcomes/objectives: the Course Outcomes (CO), the Program Outcomes (PO) and the Program Educational Objectives (PEO). The PEO is being assessed after three to five years of their graduation date and indicate the achievements of program graduates in their career and professional life after graduation. In this study, two sets of PEOs were used to survey two different groups of graduates; using the Likert's scale and achievement indicators respectively. The achievement indicators were developed by the program using stakeholders' inputs. It was found that the average Likert's point indicates a satisfactory level of achievement and the second survey showed that older batch closely matched the targeted PEO performance compared to the newer ones. In conclusion, while Likert-scale method produces favorable results, the real achievement may not be accurate due to its' dependency to the precise research question being asked, possible response bias and temporal right-censoring. On the other hand, the direct indicator-achievement method produces measurable and clear outcomes. The better performance of older batch may indicate a span of time trend where working experience plays important role in PEO achievement.","PeriodicalId":417754,"journal":{"name":"2011 3rd International Congress on Engineering Education (ICEED)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 3rd International Congress on Engineering Education (ICEED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2011.6235351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Outcome Based Education (OBE) is as an educational process which is based on trying to achieve certain specified outcomes in terms of individual student learning. The OBE assessment includes three types of outcomes/objectives: the Course Outcomes (CO), the Program Outcomes (PO) and the Program Educational Objectives (PEO). The PEO is being assessed after three to five years of their graduation date and indicate the achievements of program graduates in their career and professional life after graduation. In this study, two sets of PEOs were used to survey two different groups of graduates; using the Likert's scale and achievement indicators respectively. The achievement indicators were developed by the program using stakeholders' inputs. It was found that the average Likert's point indicates a satisfactory level of achievement and the second survey showed that older batch closely matched the targeted PEO performance compared to the newer ones. In conclusion, while Likert-scale method produces favorable results, the real achievement may not be accurate due to its' dependency to the precise research question being asked, possible response bias and temporal right-censoring. On the other hand, the direct indicator-achievement method produces measurable and clear outcomes. The better performance of older batch may indicate a span of time trend where working experience plays important role in PEO achievement.
利用校友调查评估项目教育目标:UMS的经验
基于结果的教育(OBE)是一种教育过程,其基础是努力实现个别学生学习的某些特定结果。OBE评估包括三种类型的成果/目标:课程成果(CO),项目成果(PO)和项目教育目标(PEO)。PEO在毕业后的三到五年内进行评估,并表明项目毕业生在毕业后的职业生涯和职业生活中的成就。本研究采用两套peo对两组不同的毕业生进行调查;分别使用李克特量表和成就指标。项目利用利益相关者的意见制定了成就指标。我们发现,平均李克特点表明了令人满意的成就水平,第二次调查显示,与新一批相比,旧一批的PEO性能与目标PEO性能非常匹配。综上所述,虽然李克特量表法产生了良好的结果,但由于其依赖于被问及的精确研究问题、可能的反应偏差和时间right- censorship,实际成果可能并不准确。另一方面,直接指标-成就法产生可衡量和明确的结果。较老一批的较好表现可能表明一个时间跨度的趋势,工作经验在PEO成就中起重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信