Hilary Putnam: un alegato a favor de la objetividad

Laura Balvanera Di Santo
{"title":"Hilary Putnam: un alegato a favor de la objetividad","authors":"Laura Balvanera Di Santo","doi":"10.14201/art201982125137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work is to survey Putnam’s defense of objectivity and normativity in the ethic’s realm. I pretend to show an alternative conception of objectivity which involves a broader aproach to racionality than the scientific. Moreover, this approach acknowledges pluralities of points of view and it´s committed to reflective thinking about our assertions. Then, I will examine the question of objectivity in Putnam’s papers, according to different outlooks: firstly, Putnam’s rejection to the traditional fact-value dichotomy, secondly, the Logical Postivism’ claim and his attitude about values judgments, finally, from the survey of the term objectivity and his relationship with linguistic practices.","PeriodicalId":259984,"journal":{"name":"ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios sobre la ciencia y la tecnología","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArtefaCToS. Revista de estudios sobre la ciencia y la tecnología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/art201982125137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work is to survey Putnam’s defense of objectivity and normativity in the ethic’s realm. I pretend to show an alternative conception of objectivity which involves a broader aproach to racionality than the scientific. Moreover, this approach acknowledges pluralities of points of view and it´s committed to reflective thinking about our assertions. Then, I will examine the question of objectivity in Putnam’s papers, according to different outlooks: firstly, Putnam’s rejection to the traditional fact-value dichotomy, secondly, the Logical Postivism’ claim and his attitude about values judgments, finally, from the survey of the term objectivity and his relationship with linguistic practices.
希拉里·帕特南:对客观性的辩护
这项工作的目的是调查帕特南在伦理领域对客观性和规范性的辩护。我假装要展示另一种客观性概念,它涉及比科学更广泛的理性方法。此外,这种方法承认观点的多元性,并致力于对我们的断言进行反思。然后,我将根据不同的观点来考察帕特南论文中的客观性问题:首先,帕特南对传统的事实-价值二分法的拒绝,其次,逻辑实证主义的主张和他对价值判断的态度,最后,从客观性一词及其与语言实践的关系的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信