A Comparative Study of Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis with Traditional Inguinal Method

Davud Badbarin, Seyed Ehsan Mousavi Toomatari, S. Aslanabadi, Ebrahim Farhadi, Sara Akhavan Salamat
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis with Traditional Inguinal Method","authors":"Davud Badbarin, Seyed Ehsan Mousavi Toomatari, S. Aslanabadi, Ebrahim Farhadi, Sara Akhavan Salamat","doi":"10.13029/APS.2019.25.1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Undescended testis (UDT) is a developmental defect in which one or both testicles do not arrive in the scrotum. Its prevalence at birth and one year after is 2%–4% and less than 1%, respectively. Currently, surgery is recommended to treat congenital cryptorchidism in order to prevent testicular degeneration. Classic method is performed via incision in inguinal and scrotum and the new method is done via incision in scrotum. Method: Sixty male participants with 65 UDT undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to scrotal incision (n=31) and classic inguinal incision methods (n=34). Patients were followed for 6 months and testicular atrophy, infection, recurrence, and duration of surgery were compared between two groups. Results: Scrotal incision compared to classic incision method had significantly lower duration of surgery (19.06±2.96 minutes vs. 30±10.42 minutes; p=0.002) and recurrence during follow-up (0 vs. 5 cases; p=0.026). There was only one surgical site infection in the scrotal incision method. There were hematoma and post-operative swelling in 13.3% of cases after scrotal incision method. Conclusion: Scrotal incision is an alternative method for the UDT with lower duration of surgery, lower recurrence rate, and better cosmetic results.","PeriodicalId":246042,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pediatric Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13029/APS.2019.25.1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Undescended testis (UDT) is a developmental defect in which one or both testicles do not arrive in the scrotum. Its prevalence at birth and one year after is 2%–4% and less than 1%, respectively. Currently, surgery is recommended to treat congenital cryptorchidism in order to prevent testicular degeneration. Classic method is performed via incision in inguinal and scrotum and the new method is done via incision in scrotum. Method: Sixty male participants with 65 UDT undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to scrotal incision (n=31) and classic inguinal incision methods (n=34). Patients were followed for 6 months and testicular atrophy, infection, recurrence, and duration of surgery were compared between two groups. Results: Scrotal incision compared to classic incision method had significantly lower duration of surgery (19.06±2.96 minutes vs. 30±10.42 minutes; p=0.002) and recurrence during follow-up (0 vs. 5 cases; p=0.026). There was only one surgical site infection in the scrotal incision method. There were hematoma and post-operative swelling in 13.3% of cases after scrotal incision method. Conclusion: Scrotal incision is an alternative method for the UDT with lower duration of surgery, lower recurrence rate, and better cosmetic results.
单阴囊切口睾丸切除术治疗可触及低位隐睾患儿与传统腹股沟法的比较研究
目的:隐睾(UDT)是一种发育缺陷,其中一个或两个睾丸没有到达阴囊。其在出生时和出生后一年的患病率分别为2%-4%和不到1%。目前,建议手术治疗先天性隐睾,以防止睾丸变性。传统的方法是通过腹股沟和阴囊的切口,新的方法是通过阴囊的切口。方法:60例男性65例UDT行手术,随机分为阴囊切开法31例和经典腹股沟切开法34例。随访6个月,比较两组患者睾丸萎缩、感染、复发及手术时间。结果:阴囊切开与经典切开相比,手术时间明显缩短(19.06±2.96分钟vs 30±10.42分钟);P =0.002)和随访期间复发率(0例vs. 5例;p = 0.026)。阴囊切开法仅发生一例手术部位感染。阴囊切开术后出现血肿及术后肿胀的占13.3%。结论:阴囊切口是一种手术时间短、复发率低、美容效果好的UDT替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信