Comments on Proposed Regulations: 'Contributions in Exchange for State or Local Tax Credits' (Reg-112176-18)

L. Zelenak
{"title":"Comments on Proposed Regulations: 'Contributions in Exchange for State or Local Tax Credits' (Reg-112176-18)","authors":"L. Zelenak","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3247689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These comments offer three recommendations, of which only the first involves a change in the proposed regulations themselves. First, rather than treating state tax credits as an exception to the general rule that a charitable deduction is not reduced by benefits a donor receives from third parties, the final regulations should set forth a general rule that the amount of a charitable deduction is reduced by benefits a donor receives from any source on account of the donation. Second, the preamble to the final regulations should clearly state that SALT ceiling workarounds (involving purported donations to the states themselves) would not be effective under well-established substance-over-form principles, even in the absence of new regulations. Finally, the analysis in Example 2 (in the Special Analyses, not in the proposed regulations themselves) should be revised to reflect the application of substance-over-form principles to state tax credits for contributions to the states themselves.","PeriodicalId":137820,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: National","volume":"138 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3247689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These comments offer three recommendations, of which only the first involves a change in the proposed regulations themselves. First, rather than treating state tax credits as an exception to the general rule that a charitable deduction is not reduced by benefits a donor receives from third parties, the final regulations should set forth a general rule that the amount of a charitable deduction is reduced by benefits a donor receives from any source on account of the donation. Second, the preamble to the final regulations should clearly state that SALT ceiling workarounds (involving purported donations to the states themselves) would not be effective under well-established substance-over-form principles, even in the absence of new regulations. Finally, the analysis in Example 2 (in the Special Analyses, not in the proposed regulations themselves) should be revised to reflect the application of substance-over-form principles to state tax credits for contributions to the states themselves.
对拟议法规的评论:“贡献交换州或地方税收抵免”(regg -112176-18)
这些评论提供了三个建议,其中只有第一个建议涉及对拟议法规本身的改变。首先,与其将州税收抵免视为捐赠人从第三方获得的利益不会减少慈善扣除额这一一般规则的例外,不如将最终法规规定为捐赠人因捐赠而从任何来源获得的利益都会减少慈善扣除额这一一般规则。其次,最终法规的序言应明确指出,在已确立的实质重于形式原则下,即使没有新的法规,SALT上限的变通办法(涉及据称向各州捐款)也不会有效。最后,例2中的分析(在特别分析中,而不是在拟议的条例本身中)应该进行修订,以反映实质重于形式原则对国家税收抵免对国家本身的贡献的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信