Pain Neuroscience Education for Depression: A Pilot Study

A. Louw, Ellen Wendling, Dustin Hawk, Nicole Sturdevant, Hailey Louw, Kevin P. Farrell
{"title":"Pain Neuroscience Education for Depression: A Pilot Study","authors":"A. Louw, Ellen Wendling, Dustin Hawk, Nicole Sturdevant, Hailey Louw, Kevin P. Farrell","doi":"10.31487/j.pdr.2021.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine if a brief, one-on-one pain neuroscience education (PNE) session delivered by a physical therapist (PT) can influence depression.\nMethods: A convenience sample of patients with persistent low back pain (LBP) (n = 23) attending PT with moderate to severe depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) participated in the study. Patients received a standardized, one-on-one 30-minute PNE session by a PT with pre- and post-intervention measures of low back and leg pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]), pain catastrophization (Pain Catastrophization Scale [PCS]), pain knowledge (Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire [rNPQ] and depression (PHQ-9). \nResults: Immediately following PNE, all measures improved, with low back and leg pain not being significant (pback = 0.345 and pleg = 0.633), while pain catastrophization (p = 0.047), pain knowledge (p = 0.001) and depression (p = 0.004) reaching significant improvements. The PNE session shifted various patients to lower levels of depression, with 21.8% of the patients’ improvement in depression meeting or exceeding the minimal clinical important difference.\nConclusion: PNE may be a safe, clinically effective way to help a subgroup of patients attending PT with depression. More studies are needed to further explore the results from this pilot study.","PeriodicalId":124933,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Disorders and Research","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Disorders and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.pdr.2021.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if a brief, one-on-one pain neuroscience education (PNE) session delivered by a physical therapist (PT) can influence depression. Methods: A convenience sample of patients with persistent low back pain (LBP) (n = 23) attending PT with moderate to severe depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) participated in the study. Patients received a standardized, one-on-one 30-minute PNE session by a PT with pre- and post-intervention measures of low back and leg pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]), pain catastrophization (Pain Catastrophization Scale [PCS]), pain knowledge (Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire [rNPQ] and depression (PHQ-9). Results: Immediately following PNE, all measures improved, with low back and leg pain not being significant (pback = 0.345 and pleg = 0.633), while pain catastrophization (p = 0.047), pain knowledge (p = 0.001) and depression (p = 0.004) reaching significant improvements. The PNE session shifted various patients to lower levels of depression, with 21.8% of the patients’ improvement in depression meeting or exceeding the minimal clinical important difference. Conclusion: PNE may be a safe, clinically effective way to help a subgroup of patients attending PT with depression. More studies are needed to further explore the results from this pilot study.
抑郁症的疼痛神经科学教育:一项初步研究
目的:确定物理治疗师(PT)提供的简短的一对一疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)课程是否可以影响抑郁症。方法:方便抽样,接受PT治疗并伴有中重度抑郁的持续性腰痛(LBP)患者(n = 23)(患者健康问卷-9 [PHQ-9])参与研究。患者接受由PT进行的标准化、一对一的30分钟PNE治疗,并在干预前和干预后测量腰痛和腿部疼痛(数字疼痛评定量表[NPRS])、疼痛灾难(疼痛灾难量表[PCS])、疼痛知识(修订的疼痛神经生理学问卷[rNPQ]和抑郁(PHQ-9)。结果:经PNE治疗后,患者的各项指标均有改善,腰背部和腿部疼痛无明显改善(pback = 0.345, pleg = 0.633),而疼痛化(p = 0.047)、疼痛认知(p = 0.001)和抑郁(p = 0.004)均有显著改善。PNE治疗将不同患者的抑郁程度降低,21.8%的患者的抑郁改善达到或超过了最小的临床重要差异。结论:PNE可能是一种安全,临床有效的方法来帮助亚组抑郁症患者参加PT。需要更多的研究来进一步探索这一初步研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信