Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: New improvements with noninvasive liquid biopsy technique

J. Tesarik
{"title":"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: New improvements with noninvasive liquid biopsy technique","authors":"J. Tesarik","doi":"10.35841/2591-7366-c3-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"P genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGTA) was originally performed by analyzing the first and the second polar body. However, it has later been increasingly performed by sampling trophectoderm (TE) cells from blastocysts. Recently, there is increasing concern about the reliability of this technique which has actually never been tested sufficiently in animal models and human preclinical studies. The main problems of PGTA using TE biopsy can be resumed as follows: (1) The frequency of aneuploid TE cells does not necessarily reflect that in the inner cell mass (ICM) which will give rise to the future fetus, (2) the distribution of euploid and aneuploid TE cells is not random but rather clonal, making it impossible to obtain reliable information about the frequency of aneuploidy in the whole embryo, and (3) the removal of TE cells is inherently traumatic, can decrease embryo implantation potential and produce long-term effects on the offspring health. Since, in many cases, PGTA is performed in older women, with only few and relatively fragile embryos, the technique based on TE biopsy can lead to an irreparable damage due to accidental embryo destruction or voluntary destruction of viable embryos deemed aneuploid because of a false positive PGTA result. By contrast, PGTA using non-invasive liquid biopsy is based on analysis of cell-free DNA released both from TE and ICM cells to culture medium, thus allowing a more objective ploidy evaluation of the whole embryo. Here I present the latest data obtained by comparing ploidy evaluation results obtained from cell-free DNA analysis with those obtained by analysis of DNA obtained from whole embryos donated for research from consenting patients. These results show clearly the superiority of non-invasive PGTA based on liquid biopsy (cell-free DNA) from spent culture media over the conventional TE biopsy, with a considerable reduction of interpretation errors.","PeriodicalId":254211,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35841/2591-7366-c3-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

P genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGTA) was originally performed by analyzing the first and the second polar body. However, it has later been increasingly performed by sampling trophectoderm (TE) cells from blastocysts. Recently, there is increasing concern about the reliability of this technique which has actually never been tested sufficiently in animal models and human preclinical studies. The main problems of PGTA using TE biopsy can be resumed as follows: (1) The frequency of aneuploid TE cells does not necessarily reflect that in the inner cell mass (ICM) which will give rise to the future fetus, (2) the distribution of euploid and aneuploid TE cells is not random but rather clonal, making it impossible to obtain reliable information about the frequency of aneuploidy in the whole embryo, and (3) the removal of TE cells is inherently traumatic, can decrease embryo implantation potential and produce long-term effects on the offspring health. Since, in many cases, PGTA is performed in older women, with only few and relatively fragile embryos, the technique based on TE biopsy can lead to an irreparable damage due to accidental embryo destruction or voluntary destruction of viable embryos deemed aneuploid because of a false positive PGTA result. By contrast, PGTA using non-invasive liquid biopsy is based on analysis of cell-free DNA released both from TE and ICM cells to culture medium, thus allowing a more objective ploidy evaluation of the whole embryo. Here I present the latest data obtained by comparing ploidy evaluation results obtained from cell-free DNA analysis with those obtained by analysis of DNA obtained from whole embryos donated for research from consenting patients. These results show clearly the superiority of non-invasive PGTA based on liquid biopsy (cell-free DNA) from spent culture media over the conventional TE biopsy, with a considerable reduction of interpretation errors.
非整倍体植入前基因检测:无创液体活检技术的新进展
非整倍体(PGTA)的P基因检测最初是通过分析第一极体和第二极体来进行的。然而,后来越来越多地通过从囊胚中取样滋养外胚层(TE)细胞来进行。最近,人们越来越担心这种技术的可靠性,因为这种技术实际上从未在动物模型和人类临床前研究中进行过充分的测试。使用TE活检的PGTA的主要问题可以恢复如下:(1)非整倍体TE细胞的频率并不一定反映未来胎儿产生的内细胞团(ICM);(2)整倍体和非整倍体TE细胞的分布不是随机的,而是克隆的,因此无法获得整个胚胎中非整倍体频率的可靠信息;(3)TE细胞的移除本身具有创伤性,会降低胚胎着床潜力,对后代健康产生长期影响。由于在许多情况下,PGTA是在年龄较大的女性中进行的,只有很少和相对脆弱的胚胎,基于TE活检的技术可能由于意外胚胎破坏或由于PGTA结果假阳性而被认为是非整倍体的活胚胎的自愿破坏而导致不可修复的损害。相比之下,使用非侵入性液体活检的PGTA基于对TE和ICM细胞释放到培养基中的无细胞DNA的分析,从而可以对整个胚胎进行更客观的倍性评估。在这里,我介绍了通过比较无细胞DNA分析获得的倍性评估结果与通过分析从同意的患者捐赠的用于研究的整个胚胎获得的DNA获得的结果所获得的最新数据。这些结果清楚地表明,基于废培养基液体活检(无细胞DNA)的非侵入性PGTA优于传统TE活检,可大大减少解释错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信