Abdomen and chest examinations in peer physical examination: Variation in participation by gender

Katharine J Reid, Ruth Sutherland, A. Dodds, R. McNair, David Pierce
{"title":"Abdomen and chest examinations in peer physical examination: Variation in participation by gender","authors":"Katharine J Reid, Ruth Sutherland, A. Dodds, R. McNair, David Pierce","doi":"10.11157/FOHPE.V16I2.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To compare participation in peer physical examination (PPE) for male and female students when learning abdomen and chest examinations; to compare attitudes towards PPE for male and female students; and to determine if self-reported participation as examinees in PPE was related to attitudes towards PPE. Background: The opportunity to learn physical examination skills through practising with peers in formal tutorials is an important part of many medical curricula. Method: Students voluntarily completed a self-report questionnaire at the end of their third semester of medical training in which they rated their attitudes towards PPE and indicated how often they had been examined while practising abdomen and chest examinations. Results: Students volunteered to be examined less frequently in PPE when learning chest examination compared with abdominal examination; female students volunteered less frequently than male students for chest examinations but volunteered with similar frequency for abdomen examinations. Attitudes towards PPE were not related to student gender, but students who never volunteered for abdomen examinations tended to have higher average ratings for the perceived difficulty of PPE and lower ratings for the perceived value of PPE. Most students supplemented PPE with informal practice, although a majority practised exclusively with male volunteers. Conclusions: There is clear variation in participation rates for learning examinations for PPE of the abdomen and chest, but this variation is only partly explained by student gender and attitudes.","PeriodicalId":306686,"journal":{"name":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/FOHPE.V16I2.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims: To compare participation in peer physical examination (PPE) for male and female students when learning abdomen and chest examinations; to compare attitudes towards PPE for male and female students; and to determine if self-reported participation as examinees in PPE was related to attitudes towards PPE. Background: The opportunity to learn physical examination skills through practising with peers in formal tutorials is an important part of many medical curricula. Method: Students voluntarily completed a self-report questionnaire at the end of their third semester of medical training in which they rated their attitudes towards PPE and indicated how often they had been examined while practising abdomen and chest examinations. Results: Students volunteered to be examined less frequently in PPE when learning chest examination compared with abdominal examination; female students volunteered less frequently than male students for chest examinations but volunteered with similar frequency for abdomen examinations. Attitudes towards PPE were not related to student gender, but students who never volunteered for abdomen examinations tended to have higher average ratings for the perceived difficulty of PPE and lower ratings for the perceived value of PPE. Most students supplemented PPE with informal practice, although a majority practised exclusively with male volunteers. Conclusions: There is clear variation in participation rates for learning examinations for PPE of the abdomen and chest, but this variation is only partly explained by student gender and attitudes.
同伴体格检查中的腹部和胸部检查:性别参与的差异
目的:比较男女学生在学习腹胸部检查时同伴体格检查(PPE)的参与情况;比较男女学生对个人防护用品的态度;并确定作为考生的自我报告参与PPE是否与对PPE的态度有关。背景:有机会在正式的辅导课中与同伴一起练习学习体检技能是许多医学课程的重要组成部分。方法:学生在第三学期医学培训结束时自愿完成一份自我报告问卷,评估他们对PPE的态度,并表明他们在进行腹部和胸部检查时进行检查的频率。结果:与腹部检查相比,学生在学习胸部检查时自愿接受PPE检查的次数较少;女学生自愿接受胸部检查的频率低于男学生,但自愿接受腹部检查的频率相似。对PPE的态度与学生性别无关,但从未自愿参加腹部检查的学生对PPE的感知难度的平均评分较高,对PPE的感知价值的平均评分较低。大多数学生以非正式的实践来补充个人防护装备,尽管大多数学生只与男性志愿者一起实践。结论:腹部和胸部PPE学习考试参与率存在明显差异,但这种差异仅部分由学生性别和态度解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信