ONLINE EXAMS AND THE USE OF DISHONEST PRACTICES BY STUDENTS FROM A SPORTS UNIVERSITY

Milena Kuleva
{"title":"ONLINE EXAMS AND THE USE OF DISHONEST PRACTICES BY STUDENTS FROM A SPORTS UNIVERSITY","authors":"Milena Kuleva","doi":"10.37393/icass2022/60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Dishonest methods have been part of the educational process and are likely to be in the future. However, technological progress has undoubtedly created several preconditions for unfair methods. Over the years, many studies have been conducted, and some models have been validated to assess unethical methods that evaluate different approaches. The present study investigates whether and to what extent students studying in sports-oriented courses use such methods. A literature study was conducted to summarize current research on the topic and provide a basis for creating a questionnaire for the students of the National Sports Academy “Vassil Levski”. The survey included 89 participants (38 women and 51 men) in a full-time study. The questionnaire was distributed through the National Sports Academy “Vassil Levs-ki” (NSA) professors during the summer examination session. Participation in the survey was optional and only after the end of the student’s examination. The survey was conducted in May-June 2022. The questionnaire was analyzed using Cronbach’s, which showed high-reliability (= .82). Regarding the factors of gender and faculty, no statistically significant differences were found. 30.3% (n=27) of the students responded that they had used a dishonest method and the remaining 69.7% (n=62) declared that they had not used such methods. The most common method is that of using study materials (textbooks) or notes. The following preferred method is “help by a colleague”. A correlation was found for those students who used dishonest methods that they boasted to their colleagues r = .758 ( ≤ .001) and their relatives r = .711( ≤ .001). As a major conclusion, it can be inferred that despite the dishonest methods used by the students, it generally does not lead to their desired assessment and outcome. Using more components to form a student’s final examination grade, such as exam grades from evaluations, assignments, or tests, ensures a more realistic final examination grade in the respective subject.","PeriodicalId":143321,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding book Vol.1","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding book Vol.1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37393/icass2022/60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dishonest methods have been part of the educational process and are likely to be in the future. However, technological progress has undoubtedly created several preconditions for unfair methods. Over the years, many studies have been conducted, and some models have been validated to assess unethical methods that evaluate different approaches. The present study investigates whether and to what extent students studying in sports-oriented courses use such methods. A literature study was conducted to summarize current research on the topic and provide a basis for creating a questionnaire for the students of the National Sports Academy “Vassil Levski”. The survey included 89 participants (38 women and 51 men) in a full-time study. The questionnaire was distributed through the National Sports Academy “Vassil Levs-ki” (NSA) professors during the summer examination session. Participation in the survey was optional and only after the end of the student’s examination. The survey was conducted in May-June 2022. The questionnaire was analyzed using Cronbach’s, which showed high-reliability (= .82). Regarding the factors of gender and faculty, no statistically significant differences were found. 30.3% (n=27) of the students responded that they had used a dishonest method and the remaining 69.7% (n=62) declared that they had not used such methods. The most common method is that of using study materials (textbooks) or notes. The following preferred method is “help by a colleague”. A correlation was found for those students who used dishonest methods that they boasted to their colleagues r = .758 ( ≤ .001) and their relatives r = .711( ≤ .001). As a major conclusion, it can be inferred that despite the dishonest methods used by the students, it generally does not lead to their desired assessment and outcome. Using more components to form a student’s final examination grade, such as exam grades from evaluations, assignments, or tests, ensures a more realistic final examination grade in the respective subject.
一所体育大学的学生在线考试和使用不诚实的做法
不诚实的方法已经成为教育过程的一部分,而且很可能在未来继续存在。然而,技术进步无疑为不公平的方法创造了几个先决条件。多年来,已经进行了许多研究,并且已经验证了一些模型来评估评估不同方法的不道德方法。本研究调查了学生在体育课程学习中是否以及在多大程度上使用了这种方法。通过文献研究,总结本课题的研究现状,为国家体育学院“瓦西里·列夫斯基”学生制作问卷提供依据。这项调查包括89名参与者(38名女性和51名男性),是一项全日制研究。调查问卷是在夏季考试期间通过国家体育学院“瓦西里·列夫斯基”(NSA)教授分发的。参加调查是可选的,只有在学生考试结束后。该调查于2022年5月至6月进行。问卷采用Cronbach’s进行分析,信度高(= .82)。在性别、师资等因素上,差异无统计学意义。30.3% (n=27)的学生回答他们使用了不诚实的方法,其余69.7% (n=62)的学生声称他们没有使用这种方法。最常用的方法是使用学习材料(教科书)或笔记。下面的首选方法是“同事的帮助”。使用不诚实方法向同事和亲属吹嘘的学生r = .758(≤.001)和r = .711(≤.001)存在相关性。作为一个主要结论,可以推断,尽管学生使用了不诚实的方法,但通常不会导致他们想要的评估和结果。使用更多的组成部分来形成学生的期末考试成绩,例如来自评估、作业或测试的考试成绩,可以确保在各自学科中获得更真实的期末考试成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信