An analysis of flouting maxim in the Adam Project movie

Nabillah Holifatunnisa, Dyah Ambar Wuryandari
{"title":"An analysis of flouting maxim in the Adam Project movie","authors":"Nabillah Holifatunnisa, Dyah Ambar Wuryandari","doi":"10.21009/lililacs.031.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language is used to communicate by humans with one another, not only in writing but also in the spoken form. Humans use language in spoken form to communicate. Sometimes the participants do not obey the Cooperative Principle. Some participant often gives more or less information, say something that glances at ambiguity, say something false and being irrelevant. This research focuses to find out the types of Flouting Maxim and the most Flouting Maxim frequently occurred found in The Adam Project movie. This research used descriptive qualitative method. In this research, the researcher used Grice’s (1975) theory in analysing the data. The data were taken from The Adam Project movie. The researcher found 30 data that contain Flouting Maxim in The Adam Project movie based on the theory. The result showed there are 4 types of Flouting Maxim namely Flouting Maxim of Quantity (4 data), Flouting Maxim of Quality (8 data), Flouting Maxim of Relation (4 data), Flouting Maxim of Manner (14 data). Meanwhile the most Flouting Maxim frequently occurred found in The AdamProject movie namely Flouting Maxim of Manner (14 data).","PeriodicalId":429925,"journal":{"name":"Lililacs Journal : English Literature, Language, and Cultural Studies Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lililacs Journal : English Literature, Language, and Cultural Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/lililacs.031.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language is used to communicate by humans with one another, not only in writing but also in the spoken form. Humans use language in spoken form to communicate. Sometimes the participants do not obey the Cooperative Principle. Some participant often gives more or less information, say something that glances at ambiguity, say something false and being irrelevant. This research focuses to find out the types of Flouting Maxim and the most Flouting Maxim frequently occurred found in The Adam Project movie. This research used descriptive qualitative method. In this research, the researcher used Grice’s (1975) theory in analysing the data. The data were taken from The Adam Project movie. The researcher found 30 data that contain Flouting Maxim in The Adam Project movie based on the theory. The result showed there are 4 types of Flouting Maxim namely Flouting Maxim of Quantity (4 data), Flouting Maxim of Quality (8 data), Flouting Maxim of Relation (4 data), Flouting Maxim of Manner (14 data). Meanwhile the most Flouting Maxim frequently occurred found in The AdamProject movie namely Flouting Maxim of Manner (14 data).
《亚当计划》电影中蔑视格言的分析
语言是人类相互交流的工具,不仅用书面形式,而且用口头形式。人类以口语的形式使用语言进行交流。有时参与者不遵守合作原则。一些参与者经常提供或多或少的信息,说一些含糊不清的话,说一些虚假和不相关的话。本研究的重点是找出电影《亚当计划》中最常出现的藐视格言的类型和最常见的藐视格言。本研究采用描述性定性方法。在本研究中,研究者使用了Grice’s(1975)理论来分析数据。数据取自电影《亚当计划》。研究人员根据这一理论,在电影《亚当计划》中找到了30个包含“蔑视格言”的数据。结果表明,存在4种类型的藐视准则,即数量藐视准则(4条数据)、质量藐视准则(8条数据)、关系藐视准则(4条数据)和方式藐视准则(14条数据)。同时,在电影《AdamProject》中出现频率最高的是“藐视礼仪格言”(Flouting Maxim of Manner)(14项数据)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信